Paper · 1989 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Response of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Growth, Yield, Oil Content and Its Fatty Acids to Nitrogen Rates and Application Times

A. F. Ibrahim; E. O. Abusteit; El‐M. A. El‐Metwally

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A steady and progressive increase in rapeseed yield was observed with each increment in applied nitrogen rates up to 213 kg/ha in both seasons. As for nitrogen application times, the analyzed data showed that adding a split dose (either 1/2 or 1/3) before the third irrigation was a common part between high yielding treatments in 1985/86 season. Nitrogen rates X application times interaction affected rapeseed yield significantly during the first winter season. The highest seed yield of 2.5 t/ha was obtained by adding 213 kg N/ha in two split doses at sowing and just before the third irrigation. The second yield value of 2.47 t/ha was produced under the same N rate when applied in two split doses before second and third irrigation. However, in the second season (1986/87), rapeseed plants did not exhibit significant responses to nitrogen rates X application times interaction. Chemical analyses showed that rapeseed oil content and its fatty acids (Palmetic, Stearic, Oleic, Linoleic, Linolenic, Arachidic and Erucic) percentages were not significantly affected by either nitrogen rates or application times in both seasons. A very low content of Erucic acid (0.1–0.9 %) in all tested sample was noticed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed yield increased with nitrogen rate up to 213 kg/ha in both seasons.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
applied nitrogen rates up to 213 kg/hae0
Outcome
rapeseed yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A steady and progressive increase in rapeseed yield was observed with each increment in applied nitrogen rates up to 213 kg/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen before the third irrigation was common among high yielding treatments in 1985/86.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
adding a split dose (either 1/2 or 1/3) before the third irrigatione0
Outcome
high yielding treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“adding a split dose (either 1/2 or 1/3) before the third irrigation was a common part between high yielding treatments in 1985/86 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and timing interacted significantly for yield in the first winter season.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
Nitrogen rates X application timese0
Outcome
rapeseed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rates X application times interaction affected rapeseed yield significantly during the first winter season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The top yield was 2.5 t/ha with 213 kg N/ha split between sowing and before the third irrigation.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
adding 213 kg N/ha in two split doses at sowing and just before the third irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.5 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield of 2.5 t/ha was obtained by adding 213 kg N/ha in two split doses at sowing and just before the third irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second highest yield was 2.47 t/ha with the same rate split before the second and third irrigation.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
same N rate when applied in two split doses before second and third irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
2.47 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The second yield value of 2.47 t/ha was produced under the same N rate when applied in two split doses before second and third irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate by timing interaction was not significant for yield in 1986/87.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
nitrogen rates X application timese0
Outcome
responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“in the second season (1986/87), rapeseed plants did not exhibit significant responses to nitrogen rates X application times interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil content and fatty acid percentages were not significantly affected by rate or timing in either season.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
nitrogen rates or application timese0
Outcome
oil content and its fatty acidse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed oil content and its fatty acids (Palmetic, Stearic, Oleic, Linoleic, Linolenic, Arachidic and Erucic) percentages were not significantly affected by either nitrogen rates or application times in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Erucic acid content was 0.1–0.9 % across tested samples.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Outcome
content of Erucic acide0
Value
0.1–0.9 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“A very low content of Erucic acid (0.1–0.9 %) in all tested sample was noticed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

64 papers: 31 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 29 positive, 13 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.