Paper · 1987 · Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation

Cowpea and Pearl Millet response to organic amendments in semiarid alfisols of telengana, Andhra Pradesh, India

J. Venkateswarlu

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Experiments were established in a loamy sand and a sandy loam (belonging to the family of Typic Haplustalfs and Typic Rhodustalfs of the great soil group Alfisols) with pearl millet and cowpea crop residues, cattle manure, and compost at 20 kg N ha−1 equivalence grown over an 8‐year period. These two crops were grown in rotation. Pearl millet received additionally 20 kg N ha−1, while 8.7 kg P ha−1 was applied to cowpea in this rotation. It was found that incorporation of crop residues at 2.0 tons • ha−1 (20 kg N ha−1) of pearl millet or cowpea gave increased yields of 18 and 13%, respectively. This was accompanied by improvement in the hydraulic conductivity, available N and K, and a tendency for increased mean weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated pearl millet residue increased yield by 18%.

Taxon
Cowpea and Pearl MilletVigna unguiculataCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
pearl millete0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of crop residues at 2.0 tons • ha−1 (20 kg N ha−1) of pearl millet or cowpea gave increased yields of 18 and 13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated cowpea residue increased yield by 13%.

Taxon
Cowpea and Pearl MilletVigna unguiculataCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
cowpeae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of crop residues at 2.0 tons • ha−1 (20 kg N ha−1) of pearl millet or cowpea gave increased yields of 18 and 13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation improved hydraulic conductivity and available N and K.

Taxon
Cowpea and Pearl MilletVigna unguiculataCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
incorporation of crop residuese1
Outcome
hydraulic conductivity, available N and Ke0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was accompanied by improvement in the hydraulic conductivity, available N and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“incorporation of crop residues at 2.0 tons • ha−1 (20 kg N ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation tended to increase mean weight.

Taxon
Cowpea and Pearl MilletVigna unguiculataCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
incorporation of crop residuese1
Outcome
mean weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
tendencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a tendency for increased mean weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–736 · show in text ↑
e1

“incorporation of crop residues at 2.0 tons • ha−1 (20 kg N ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea and Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.