Paper · 1975 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

INFLUENCE OF FENSULFOTHION AND FENAMIPHOS ON ROOT LESION NEMATODE NUMBERS AND YIELD OF FORAGE LEGUMES

L. S. THOMPSON; C. B. WILLIS

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was made of the effects of three rates of fenamiphos [ethyl-3-methyl-4-(methylthio) phenyl (1-methylethyl) phosphoramidate] and fensulfothion [O,O-diethyl O-(p-(methylsulfinyl) phenyl) phosphorothioate] on root lesion nematode numbers (Pratylenchus spp.), and on forage yields of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes. Seeding year yields were increased by both nematicides. Neither nematicide resulted in substantial yield increases at the time of the the first cut (June) of the second growing season, but did result in considerably increased yields at the time of the second and third cuts. At the same rates of application, fenamiphos provided better control of nematodes than did fensulfothion, particularly with increasing time following treatment. The larger total yield increases for the two growing seasons from fenamiphos-treated plots were coincident with better root lesion nematode control. Fewer alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil and red clover taproots were infected by Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in fenamiphos-treated plots, where there were fewer root lesion nematodes, than in check plots. Laboratory tests indicated that field rates of fensulfothion and fenamiphos were not fungicidal to a number of soil fungi, including Fusarium spp. and R. solani, found associated with forage legume roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fensulfothion reduced root lesion nematodes in the soil and rootlets of red clover.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratenset0
Treatment
fensulfothione0
Interactor
root lesion nematodese0pest
Outcome
populations of root lesion nematodese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fenamiphos reduced root lesion nematodes in the soil and rootlets of red clover.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratenset0
Treatment
fenamiphose0
Interactor
root lesion nematodese0pest
Outcome
populations of root lesion nematodese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fensulfothion reduced root lesion nematodes in the soil and rootlets of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fensulfothione0
Interactor
root lesion nematodese0pest
Outcome
populations of root lesion nematodese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fenamiphos reduced root lesion nematodes in the soil and rootlets of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fenamiphose0
Interactor
root lesion nematodese0pest
Outcome
populations of root lesion nematodese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fensulfothion reduced root lesion nematodes in the soil and rootlets of birdsfoot trefoil.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
fensulfothione0
Interactor
root lesion nematodese0pest
Outcome
populations of root lesion nematodese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fenamiphos reduced root lesion nematodes in the soil and rootlets of birdsfoot trefoil.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
fenamiphose0
Interactor
root lesion nematodese0pest
Outcome
populations of root lesion nematodese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested (fensulfothion − 11.2, 22.4 and 44.8 kg/ha; fenamiphos − 5.6, 11.2 and 22.4 kg/ha) reduced populations of root lesion nematodes in the soil, as well as in rootlets of the three forage legumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both nematicides increased seeding-year yields of red clover.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratenset0
Treatment
both nematicidese0
Outcome
Seeding year yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeding year yields were increased by both nematicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both nematicides increased seeding-year yields of alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
both nematicidese0
Outcome
Seeding year yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeding year yields were increased by both nematicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both nematicides increased seeding-year yields of birdsfoot trefoil.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoilt0
Treatment
both nematicidese0
Outcome
Seeding year yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seeding year yields were increased by both nematicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicides did not substantially increase forage yields at the first cut of the second season.

Taxon
forage legumest0
Treatment
nematicidee0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
substantial yield increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Neither nematicide resulted in substantial yield increases at the time of the the first cut (June) of the second growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE LEGUMES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicides considerably increased forage yields at the second and third cuts of the second season.

Taxon
forage legumest0
Treatment
nematicidese1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“did result in considerably increased yields at the time of the second and third cuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE LEGUMES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both nematicides, at the rates tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos controlled nematodes better than fensulfothion at equal rates, especially later after treatment.

Taxon
FORAGE LEGUMESt0
Treatment
fenamiphose0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
control of nematodese0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
particularly with increasing time following treatmente0
Comparator
fensulfothione0

Verbatim

e0

“At the same rates of application, fenamiphos provided better control of nematodes than did fensulfothion, particularly with increasing time following treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE LEGUMES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger two-season yield increases with fenamiphos coincided with better nematode control.

Taxon
FORAGE LEGUMESt0
Treatment
fenamiphos-treated plotse0
Interactor
root lesion nematodee0pest
Outcome
total yield increasese0
Direction
largere0

Verbatim

e0

“The larger total yield increases for the two growing seasons from fenamiphos-treated plots were coincident with better root lesion nematode control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE LEGUMES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos plots had fewer legume taproots infected by Fusarium spp. than check plots.

Taxon
alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil and red clovere0
Treatment
fenamiphos-treated plotse0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
taproots were infectede0
Direction
Fewere0
Comparator
check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fewer alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil and red clover taproots were infected by Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in fenamiphos-treated plots, where there were fewer root lesion nematodes, than in check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenamiphos plots had fewer legume taproots infected by Rhizoctonia solani Kühn than check plots.

Taxon
alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil and red clovere0
Treatment
fenamiphos-treated plotse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani KühnRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
taproots were infectede0
Direction
Fewere0
Comparator
check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fewer alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil and red clover taproots were infected by Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in fenamiphos-treated plots, where there were fewer root lesion nematodes, than in check plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field rates of both nematicides were not fungicidal to tested soil fungi.

Taxon
soil fungie0
Treatment
fensulfothion and fenamiphose0
Outcome
not fungicidale0

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory tests indicated that field rates of fensulfothion and fenamiphos were not fungicidal to a number of soil fungi, including Fusarium spp. and R. solani, found associated with forage legume roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1638 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

insecticide · yield · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.