Abstract
The effect of various concentrations of diamine putrescine (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM) on the quality and storage life of peach (Prunus persica L. cv. Zaafarani) fruit was evaluated during storage at 2°C. Treatments were performed immediately after harvest. Flesh firmness, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH, weight loss and ethylene emission were determined on treated and untreated (controls) fruit. Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production as well as increase in fruit flesh firmness. Soluble solids content and pH declined, but titratable acidity was higher in putrescine-treated fruits. The weight loss of peach fruit also decreased during storage. In addition, exogenous putrescine showed an improvement in peach storability at 2°C. Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Putrescine reduced ethylene production.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- putrescinee0
- Outcome
- ethylene productione0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Putrescine increased flesh firmness.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- putrescinee0
- Outcome
- fruit flesh firmnesse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production as well as increase in fruit flesh firmness”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Putrescine lowered soluble solids and pH.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- putrescine-treatede0
- Outcome
- Soluble solids content and pHe0
- Direction
- declinede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soluble solids content and pH declined, but titratable acidity was higher in putrescine-treated fruits”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Putrescine raised titratable acidity.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- putrescine-treatede0
- Outcome
- titratable aciditye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“titratable acidity was higher in putrescine-treated fruits”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Putrescine reduced weight loss during storage.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- putrescinee1
- Outcome
- weight losse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The weight loss of peach fruit also decreased during storage”
t0“peach”
e1“Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production”
Claim · model-written summary
Putrescine improved storability at 2°C.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- exogenous putrescinee0
- Outcome
- peach storabilitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Qualifier
- 2°Ce0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“exogenous putrescine showed an improvement in peach storability at 2°C”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit treated with 0.5 mM putrescine stored for 14 days versus 11 days in controls.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit treated with 1 mM putrescine stored for 17 days.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit treated with 2 mM putrescine stored for 19 days.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit treated with 3 mM putrescine stored for 21 days.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”
t0“peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit treated with 4 mM putrescine stored for 22 days.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”
t0“peach”
The same questions in other papers
putrescine · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
putrescine · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.