Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation

Effect of exogenous putrescine treatment on the quality and storage life of peach (Prunus persicaL.) fruit

Mohammad Reza Zokaee Khosroshahi; Mahmood Esna Ashari

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of various concentrations of diamine putrescine (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM) on the quality and storage life of peach (Prunus persica L. cv. Zaafarani) fruit was evaluated during storage at 2°C. Treatments were performed immediately after harvest. Flesh firmness, soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH, weight loss and ethylene emission were determined on treated and untreated (controls) fruit. Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production as well as increase in fruit flesh firmness. Soluble solids content and pH declined, but titratable acidity was higher in putrescine-treated fruits. The weight loss of peach fruit also decreased during storage. In addition, exogenous putrescine showed an improvement in peach storability at 2°C. Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine reduced ethylene production.

Treatment
putrescinee0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine increased flesh firmness.

Treatment
putrescinee0
Outcome
fruit flesh firmnesse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production as well as increase in fruit flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine lowered soluble solids and pH.

Treatment
putrescine-treatede0
Outcome
Soluble solids content and pHe0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble solids content and pH declined, but titratable acidity was higher in putrescine-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine raised titratable acidity.

Treatment
putrescine-treatede0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“titratable acidity was higher in putrescine-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine reduced weight loss during storage.

Treatment
putrescinee1
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight loss of peach fruit also decreased during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of putrescine resulted in a reduction in ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine improved storability at 2°C.

Treatment
exogenous putrescinee0
Outcome
peach storabilitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
2°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenous putrescine showed an improvement in peach storability at 2°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 0.5 mM putrescine stored for 14 days versus 11 days in controls.

Treatment
0.5e0
Outcome
stored welle0
Value
14e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 1 mM putrescine stored for 17 days.

Treatment
1e0
Outcome
stored welle0
Value
17e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 2 mM putrescine stored for 19 days.

Treatment
2e0
Outcome
stored welle0
Value
19e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 3 mM putrescine stored for 21 days.

Treatment
3e0
Outcome
stored welle0
Value
21e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit treated with 4 mM putrescine stored for 22 days.

Treatment
4e0
Outcome
stored welle0
Value
22e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM putrescine stored well for 14, 17, 19, 21 and 22 days, respectively, compared with the control which stored for only 11 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

putrescine · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

putrescine · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.