Paper · 2011 · Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Developed microbial biofilms can restore deteriorated conventional agricultural soils

G. Seneviratne; A.P.D.A. Jayasekara; M.S.D.L. De Silva; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
83
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen fixing bacteria play a key role in the growth and persistence of effective microbial communities in the soil by supplying N through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). In the long run, chemical inputs, particularly N fertilisers are known to adversely affect N2 fixers and hence maintenance of soil fertility and crop productivity. This study examined the effect of developed microbial biofilms with N2 fixers on restoration of soils deteriorated by conventional agricultural practices in tea cultivation. Just reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50% significantly increased soil microbial biomass and BNF, and decreased soil NO3− and pest infestation. The lower chemical fertiliser addition coupled with the biofilm-based biofertilisers known as biofilmed biofertilisers (BFBFs) further increased BNF significantly. The combined application significantly increased soil organic C by ca. 20%, and reduced leaf transpiration by ca. 40%. It also supported plant growth, rhizoremediation and soil moisture conservation in comparison to the 100% chemical fertilisation. Those improved performances were observed to be proportional to the increased density of soil bacteria, and have several agronomic and environmental implications. It is apparent from this study that replenishing the depleted soil microbial communities by applying such biofertilisers is likely to be beneficial in agroecosystems with chemical N fertiliser use, if they are to be sustained for crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving recommended chemical fertilizer increased soil microbial biomass and BNF significantly.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50%e0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass and BNFe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
recommended chemical fertiliser usee0

Verbatim

e0

“Just reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50% significantly increased soil microbial biomass and BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–626 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving recommended chemical fertilizer decreased soil NO3−.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50%e0
Outcome
soil NO3−e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
recommended chemical fertiliser usee0

Verbatim

e0

“Just reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50% significantly increased soil microbial biomass and BNF, and decreased soil NO3− and pest infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving recommended chemical fertilizer decreased pest infestation.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50%e0
Outcome
pest infestatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
recommended chemical fertiliser usee0

Verbatim

e0

“Just reducing recommended chemical fertiliser use by 50% significantly increased soil microbial biomass and BNF, and decreased soil NO3− and pest infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biofilmed biofertilizers to reduced fertilizer further increased BNF significantly.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
lower chemical fertiliser addition coupled with the biofilm-based biofertiliserse0
Outcome
BNFe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
lower chemical fertiliser additione0

Verbatim

e0

“The lower chemical fertiliser addition coupled with the biofilm-based biofertilisers known as biofilmed biofertilisers (BFBFs) further increased BNF significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined reduced fertilizer and BFBFs increased soil organic C by about 20%.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
soil organic Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
ca. 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application significantly increased soil organic C by ca. 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined reduced fertilizer and BFBFs reduced tea leaf transpiration by about 40%.

Taxon
teae1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
leaf transpiratione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
ca. 40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application significantly increased soil organic C by ca. 20%, and reduced leaf transpiration by ca. 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment supported plant growth, rhizoremediation, and soil moisture conservation relative to full chemical fertilization.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Ite0
Outcome
plant growth, rhizoremediation and soil moisture conservatione0
Direction
supportede0
Comparator
100% chemical fertilisatione0

Verbatim

e0

“It also supported plant growth, rhizoremediation and soil moisture conservation in comparison to the 100% chemical fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved performances were proportional to greater soil bacterial density.

Taxon
teae1
Interactor
soil bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
improved performancese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Those improved performances were observed to be proportional to the increased density of soil bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that replenishing soil microbial communities with biofertilizers is likely beneficial for fertilizer-dependent crop production.

Taxon
teae1
Outcome
replenishing the depleted soil microbial communities by applying such biofertiliserse0
Qualifier
likely to be beneficial in agroecosystems with chemical N fertiliser usee0

Verbatim

e0

“replenishing the depleted soil microbial communities by applying such biofertilisers is likely to be beneficial in agroecosystems with chemical N fertiliser use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1446 · show in text ↑
e1

“tea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–513 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.