Paper · 1968 · Experimental Agriculture

The Agronomic Efficiency of the N.I.A.E. Mechanized Tied Ridge System of Cultivation

M. Dagg; J. C. Macartney

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
35
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A tied ridge system of hand cultivation has been practised successfully in parts of Tanzania for many years. Equipment to mechanize this system was devised and constructed by the National Institute for Agricultural Engineering, U.K., particularly for use in areas of marginal rainfall where water conservation is essential. Agronomic trials with this equipment were carried out on three soil types in Northern Tanzania. Records from resistance units showed much better penetration of rainfall under tied ridges than under flat cultivation. Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking. Weeding operations using a ridging body achieved a satisfactory control. After a few modifications to the equipment, especially the incorporation of a small tine to rip the bottom of the basins to improve infiltration, the system of cultivation based on ripping, ridging and tieing proved to be an adequate alternative to ploughing and harrowing for seed bed preparation, and a much more efficient method of water conservation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tied ridges gave much better rainfall penetration than flat cultivation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
tied ridgese1
Outcome
penetration of rainfalle1
Direction
much bettere1
Comparator
flat cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Records from resistance units showed much better penetration of rainfall under tied ridges than under flat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–546 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield responses were obtained only when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to water stress at tasselling and silking.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
yield responsese2
Qualifier
only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding with a ridging body achieved a satisfactory weed control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
Weeding operations using a ridging bodye3
Outcome
controle3
Qualifier
satisfactorye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–741 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weeding operations using a ridging body achieved a satisfactory control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–814 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ripping, ridging and tieing system was an adequate alternative to ploughing and harrowing for seed bed preparation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
seed bed preparatione4
Qualifier
adequate alternativee4
Comparator
ploughing and harrowinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the system of cultivation based on ripping, ridging and tieing proved to be an adequate alternative to ploughing and harrowing for seed bed preparation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1113 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tied ridge system was a much more efficient method of water conservation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
water conservatione5
Qualifier
much more efficient methode5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“a much more efficient method of water conservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1169 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corresponding yield responses in maize were only obtained when the increase in available water made an appreciable difference to conditions of water stress at the time of tasselling and silking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–741 · show in text ↑