Paper · 1969 · Physiologia Plantarum

A Model of the Photosynthesizing Leaf

K. W. Brown

12
claims
17
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A model is proposed for the relationship between net photosynthetic rate (N) and light Intensity at a given concentration of CO 2 in the air ([CO 2 ] a ). The model provides a prediction of the sum of the diffusion resistances (Σr), the capacity (K) of the leaf to fix CO 2 , the concentration of CO 2 at the point of photosynthesis ([CO 2 ] g ), and the respiration rate (R). The model fits the available data well and provides a frame work by which future research may be guided. The calculated values of [CO 2 ] g decreased from [CO 2 ] g at the compensation point to a nearly constant value at high tight intensities. [CO 2 ] g high light infensitit‐s range from 32 to 144 μ/l (volume) depending on the species. When these values of [CO 2 ] g , are used in the diffusion equation, the resulting levels of the mesophyll resistance (r m ) are lower than those calculated by using the assumptions that [CO 2 ] g equals zero. The plants which had (he higher photosynthetic rates at a given light intensity and [CO 2 ] a had grealer values of [CO 2 ] g than those with lower photo‐synthetic rates. The calculated rates of respiration of wheat leaves were twice as high as those measured in the dark. This suggests that the light respiration rate may be twice as great as the dark respiration rate at the same temperature. The calculated values of K demonstrate variability within and between species. The maximum N was independent of K. A relationship between K and the maximum quantum efficiency, at constant levels of [CO 2 ] g , was demonstrated in several species. The Σr was inversely related to the maximum rate of photosynthesis for the species investigated. The values of r m calculated for cotton were inversely related to [CO 2 ] a suggesting that the transfer of [CO 2 ] in the cell may involve a concentration dependent chemical reaction in addition to or rather than a physical diffusion process.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated CO2 concentration at the point of photosynthesis at high light ranges from 32 to 144 μl/l depending on species.

Taxon
speciese1
Outcome
[CO 2 ] ge0
Value
32 to 144 μ/le1
Qualifier
depending on the speciese1

Verbatim

e0

“The calculated values of [CO 2 ] g decreased from [CO 2 ] g at the compensation point to a nearly constant value at high tight intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“range from 32 to 144 μ/l (volume) depending on the species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–723 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated CO2 concentration at the point of photosynthesis decreased from the compensation point to a nearly constant value at high light.

Taxon
speciese1
Outcome
[CO 2 ] ge0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
nearly constant value at high tight intensitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“The calculated values of [CO 2 ] g decreased from [CO 2 ] g at the compensation point to a nearly constant value at high tight intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“range from 32 to 144 μ/l (volume) depending on the species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–723 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Plants with higher photosynthetic rates had greater calculated CO2 concentration at the point of photosynthesis.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee2
Treatment
higher photosynthetic ratese2
Outcome
[CO 2 ] ge2
Direction
grealere2

Verbatim

e2

“The plants which had (he higher photosynthetic rates at a given light intensity and [CO 2 ] a had grealer values of [CO 2 ] g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1060 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated respiration rates of wheat leaves were twice as high as rates measured in the dark.

Taxon
wheat leavesTriticum aestivume4
Outcome
rates of respiratione4
Direction
twice as highe4
Comparator
those measured in the darke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The calculated rates of respiration of wheat leaves were twice as high as those measured in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1206 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Light respiration rate may be twice as great as dark respiration rate in wheat leaves at the same temperature.

Taxon
wheat leavesTriticum aestivume4
Outcome
light respiration ratee5
Direction
twice as greate5
Comparator
dark respiration ratee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The calculated rates of respiration of wheat leaves were twice as high as those measured in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1206 · show in text ↑
e5

“This suggests that the light respiration rate may be twice as great as the dark respiration rate at the same temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1328 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated values of K show variability within and between species.

Taxon
speciese6
Outcome
values of Ke6

Verbatim

e6

“The calculated values of K demonstrate variability within and between species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum N was independent of K in plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee2
Outcome
maximum Ne7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
Ke7

Verbatim

e2

“The plants which had (he higher photosynthetic rates at a given light intensity and [CO 2 ] a had grealer values of [CO 2 ] g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1060 · show in text ↑
e7

“The maximum N was independent of K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1443 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The relationship between K and maximum quantum efficiency was demonstrated in several species at constant CO2 levels.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
maximum quantum efficiencye0
Qualifier
at constant levels of [CO 2 ] ge0
Comparator
Ke0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A relationship between K and the maximum quantum efficiency, at constant levels of [CO 2 ] g , was demonstrated in several species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1575 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Σr was inversely related to the maximum rate of photosynthesis across the species investigated.

Taxon
speciese0
Treatment
Σre0
Outcome
maximum rate of photosynthesise0
Direction
inverselye0

Verbatim

e0

“The Σr was inversely related to the maximum rate of photosynthesis for the species investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1672 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Mesophyll resistance calculated for cotton was inversely related to CO2 concentration in air.

Treatment
[CO 2 ] ae0
Outcome
r me0
Direction
inverselye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of r m calculated for cotton were inversely related to [CO 2 ] a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1749 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 transfer in cotton cells may involve a concentration-dependent chemical reaction in addition to or rather than physical diffusion.

Outcome
transfer of [CO 2 ]e1
Qualifier
concentration dependent chemical reactione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of r m calculated for cotton were inversely related to [CO 2 ] a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1749 · show in text ↑
e1

“the transfer of [CO 2 ] in the cell may involve a concentration dependent chemical reaction in addition to or rather than a physical diffusion process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1916 · show in text ↑