Paper · 1980 · Annals of Applied Biology

Control of Botrytis cinerea and Botrytis squamosa in overwintered salad onions by fungicide sprays

A. H. PRESLY; R. B. MAUDE

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY In 1974/75, 13 sprays of 0·2% a.i. thiram applied at 14 day intervals to overwintered salad onions reduced the incidence of Botrytis cinerea and significantly increased onion yields. In 1977/78 both B. cinerea and B. squamosa occurred, and 12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervals or 6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa and significantly increased onion yields. Benomyl (0·1% a.i. at 14‐day intervals, or 0·2% a.i. at 28‐day intervals) failed to control either pathogen because of the development of carbendazim‐insensitive strains of the fungi. Effective control of both pathogens and increased yields were obtained with an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and January.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiram sprays reduced Botrytis cinerea incidence.

Taxon
salad onionse0
Treatment
13 sprays of 0·2% a.i. thiram applied at 14 day intervalse0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“13 sprays of 0·2% a.i. thiram applied at 14 day intervals to overwintered salad onions reduced the incidence of Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiram sprays significantly increased onion yields.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
13 sprays of 0·2% a.i. thiram applied at 14 day intervalse0
Outcome
onion yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13 sprays of 0·2% a.i. thiram applied at 14 day intervals to overwintered salad onions reduced the incidence of Botrytis cinerea and significantly increased onion yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. controlled B. cinerea.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervalse0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
good control of B. cinereae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervals or 6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. controlled B. squamosa.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervalse0
Interactor
B. squamosaBotrytis squamosae0pathogen
Outcome
good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis squamosa
Botrytis squamosa · InteractorRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervals or 6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six iprodione sprays at 0·2% a.i. controlled B. cinerea.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervalse0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
good control of B. cinereae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“iprodione sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six iprodione sprays at 0·2% a.i. controlled B. squamosa.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervalse0
Interactor
B. squamosaBotrytis squamosae0pathogen
Outcome
good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis squamosa
Botrytis squamosa · InteractorRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione spray schedules significantly increased onion yields.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervalse0
Outcome
onion yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“12 iprodione sprays at 0·1% a.i. applied at 14‐day intervals or 6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa and significantly increased onion yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The six-spray iprodione schedule significantly increased onion yields.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervalse0
Outcome
onion yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“6 sprays at 0·2% a.i. applied at 28‐day intervals gave good control of B. cinerea and B. squamosa and significantly increased onion yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl failed to control B. cinerea because insensitive fungal strains developed.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
Benomyl (0·1% a.i. at 14‐day intervals, or 0·2% a.i. at 28‐day intervals)e0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
failed to control either pathogene0
Qualifier
development of carbendazim‐insensitive strains of the fungie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Benomyl (0·1% a.i. at 14‐day intervals, or 0·2% a.i. at 28‐day intervals) failed to control either pathogen because of the development of carbendazim‐insensitive strains of the fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–635 · show in text ↑
e1

“both B. cinerea and B. squamosa occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl failed to control B. squamosa because insensitive fungal strains developed.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
Benomyl (0·1% a.i. at 14‐day intervals, or 0·2% a.i. at 28‐day intervals)e0
Interactor
B. squamosaBotrytis squamosae1pathogen
Outcome
failed to control either pathogene0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis squamosa
Botrytis squamosa · InteractorRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Benomyl (0·1% a.i. at 14‐day intervals, or 0·2% a.i. at 28‐day intervals) failed to control either pathogen because of the development of carbendazim‐insensitive strains of the fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–635 · show in text ↑
e1

“both B. cinerea and B. squamosa occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential thiram and iprodione applications controlled B. cinerea.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and Januarye0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
Effective control of both pathogense0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effective control of both pathogens and increased yields were obtained with an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and January.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“both B. cinerea and B. squamosa occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential thiram and iprodione applications controlled B. squamosa.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and Januarye0
Interactor
B. squamosaBotrytis squamosae1pathogen
Outcome
Effective control of both pathogense0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis squamosa
Botrytis squamosa · InteractorRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effective control of both pathogens and increased yields were obtained with an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and January.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“both B. cinerea and B. squamosa occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential thiram and iprodione applications increased onion yields.

Taxon
salad onionst0
Treatment
an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and Januarye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“salad onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effective control of both pathogens and increased yields were obtained with an application of 0·4% a.i. thiram in October and November followed by an application of 0·2% a.i. iprodione in December and January.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–845 · show in text ↑

thiram · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
    Foliar boron decreased yields in onions.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.