Paper · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Leaf illumination and root cooling inhibit bean leaf expansion by decreasing turgor pressure

A. Pardossi; J. Pritchard; A.D. Tomos

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves were subjected to dark-light or light-dark transition at a root temperature of 25 °C, or to root cooling to 10 °C. Illumination or darkening caused rapid changes in water flux through the plants and in epidermal turgor pressure when analysed by pressure probe. However, these were not concurrent with variations in bulk leaf water potential and turgor pressure as determined by the pressure chamber method. In addition, the turgor pressure of epidermis measured with the pressure probe was invariably 0.05 to 0.15 MPa lower than that measured in bulk tissue with the pressure chamber. Cooling roots to 10°C induced water stress and wilting. Both techniques indicated a decrease of turgor pressure, but a 20-30 min lag was observed with the pressure chamber. Due to stomatal closure and decreased transpiration, root-cooled plants regained cell turgor after 5-7 h of cooling, but bulk tissue and epidermal turgor (as well as leaf growth rate) remained significantly lower than control levels. These findings indicate that changes in turgor pressure as the result of hydraulic signalling are sufficient to explain the rapid changes in growth rate following illumination or cooling reported in earlier work (Sattin et al 1990). They also indicate that data obtained by use of the pressure chamber must be treated with caution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling roots to 10°C decreased turgor pressure of bean leaves relative to control, with a 20-30 min lag in the pressure chamber.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Cooling roots to 10°Ce1
Outcome
turgor pressuree3
Direction
decreasee3
Qualifier
a 20-30 min lag was observed with the pressure chambere4
Comparator
control levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cooling roots to 10°C induced water stress and wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–695 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulk tissue and epidermal turgor (as well as leaf growth rate) remained significantly lower than control levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1046 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both techniques indicated a decrease of turgor pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–752 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 20-30 min lag was observed with the pressure chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–812 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Illumination or darkening caused rapid changes in epidermal turgor pressure and water flux of bean plants.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Illumination or darkeninge5
Outcome
epidermal turgor pressuree5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“Illumination or darkening caused rapid changes in water flux through the plants and in epidermal turgor pressure when analysed by pressure probe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–315 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epidermal turgor measured with the pressure probe was 0.05 to 0.15 MPa lower than bulk-tissue turgor measured with the pressure chamber.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
turgor pressure of epidermise6
Direction
lowere6
Value
0.05 to 0.15 MPae6
Comparator
bulk tissuee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“the turgor pressure of epidermis measured with the pressure probe was invariably 0.05 to 0.15 MPa lower than that measured in bulk tissue with the pressure chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–639 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-cooled bean plants regained cell turgor after 5-7 h of cooling.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
root-cooled plantse7
Outcome
cell turgore7
Direction
regainede7
Qualifier
after 5-7 h of coolinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e7

“root-cooled plants regained cell turgor after 5-7 h of cooling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under root cooling to 10°C, bulk tissue and epidermal turgor remained significantly lower than control levels.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Cooling roots to 10°Ce1
Outcome
bulk tissue and epidermal turgore2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
control levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cooling roots to 10°C induced water stress and wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–695 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulk tissue and epidermal turgor (as well as leaf growth rate) remained significantly lower than control levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under root cooling to 10°C, leaf growth rate remained significantly lower than control levels.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Cooling roots to 10°Ce1
Outcome
leaf growth ratee2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
control levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cooling roots to 10°C induced water stress and wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–695 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulk tissue and epidermal turgor (as well as leaf growth rate) remained significantly lower than control levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1046 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in turgor pressure from hydraulic signalling are sufficient to explain the rapid changes in growth rate after illumination or cooling.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
rapid changes in growth ratee6
Qualifier
changes in turgor pressure as the result of hydraulic signallinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“changes in turgor pressure as the result of hydraulic signalling are sufficient to explain the rapid changes in growth rate following illumination or cooling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1234 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Data obtained with the pressure chamber must be treated with caution.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
data obtained by use of the pressure chambere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris plants with expanding primary leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e7

“data obtained by use of the pressure chamber must be treated with caution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1378 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

processing · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

processing · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.