Paper · 1959 · American Journal of Botany

SEEDLING GROWTH STUDIES OF EARLY‐RIPENING PEACHES. I. INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMBRYO MATURITY, GROWTH SUBSTANCES AND SEEDLING GROWTH

Gerald M. Weaver; L. Fredric Hough

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

W eaver , G erald M., and L. F redric H ough . (Rutgers, The State Univ., New Brunswick, N. J.) Seedling growth studies of early‐ripening peaches. I. Interrelationship between embryo maturity, growth substances and seedling growth. Amer. Jour. Bot. 46(10): 718–724. Illus. 1959.—Peach fruits of ‘Raritan Rose’ were harvested 75, 83, 91, 99 and 107 days after full bloom. Embryos were excised, and cultured on artificial media. Growth responses following 8 wk. cold treatment varied considerably with embryo maturity. No correlation existed between seedling survival and the initial responses of shoots. Root growth of 83‐day embryos exceeded that of all other stages of maturity. This was reflected in maximum seedling survival and vigor. Initial shoot growth was greatest from embryos harvested at 91 days and at maturity (107 days), but all shoots developed into rosettes which may expand slightly or develop normally from axillary buds. Bioassays of growth substances suggest a strong correlation between early shoot development and auxin concentration. Root growth‐responses appeared to be correlated with a promotor‐inhibitor balance. The results of wheat coleoptile assays of embryo extracts chromatographed in an isopropanol: ammonia: water solvent (8:1:1) suggest the presence of three growth promotors, in greatest concentration at Rf 0.70, but also at Rf values 0.10 and 0.30. Two growth inhibitors were present in embryo tissue at Rf values 0.27 and 0.96, the former decreasing in concentration with increasing embryo maturity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach growth responses after cold treatment varied with embryo maturity.

Organ / stage
embryoe0
Treatment
8 wk. cold treatmente0
Outcome
Growth responsese0
Direction
varied considerablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth responses following 8 wk. cold treatment varied considerably with embryo maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling survival had no correlation with initial shoot responses.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
No correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No correlation existed between seedling survival and the initial responses of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth of 83-day embryos exceeded all other maturity stages.

Organ / stage
83‐day embryose0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
all other stages of maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth of 83‐day embryos exceeded that of all other stages of maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 83-day stage had maximum seedling survival and vigor.

Organ / stage
83‐day embryost1
Outcome
maximum seedling survival and vigore0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was reflected in maximum seedling survival and vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
t1

“83‐day embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial shoot growth was greatest at 91 and 107 days.

Organ / stage
embryose0
Outcome
Initial shoot growthe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
91 days and at maturity (107 days)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial shoot growth was greatest from embryos harvested at 91 days and at maturity (107 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All shoots formed rosettes, with some later expansion or axillary development.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
developed into rosettese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all shoots developed into rosettes which may expand slightly or develop normally from axillary buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early shoot development correlated strongly with auxin concentration.

Compound
auxine0
Outcome
early shoot developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a strong correlation between early shoot development and auxin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth responses appeared correlated with a promoter-inhibitor balance.

Compound
promotor‐inhibitore0
Outcome
Root growth‐responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth‐responses appeared to be correlated with a promotor‐inhibitor balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo extracts suggested three growth promoters, strongest at Rf 0.70.

Organ / stage
embryot1
Outcome
presence of three growth promotorse0
Value
Rf 0.70e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggest the presence of three growth promotors, in greatest concentration at Rf 0.70, but also at Rf values 0.10 and 0.30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
t1

“embryo extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two growth inhibitors were present in embryo tissue at Rf 0.27 and 0.96.

Organ / stage
embryo tissuee0
Outcome
Two growth inhibitors were presente0
Value
Rf values 0.27 and 0.96e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two growth inhibitors were present in embryo tissue at Rf values 0.27 and 0.96”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inhibitor at Rf 0.27 declined as embryo maturity increased.

Organ / stage
embryoe0
Outcome
decreasing in concentratione0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
formere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the former decreasing in concentration with increasing embryo maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–284 · show in text ↑