Paper · 1978 · Crop Science

Soybean Seed Yield Losses Caused by Powdery Mildew1

J. M. Dunleavy

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Yield losses in soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) caused by natural infection with Microsphaera diffusa Cke. & Pk., the powdery mildew fungus, have not been determined. The objective of this study was to determine if M. diffusa caused loss of seed yield in soybeans. Three susceptible (‘Harosoy 63’, ‘Kanrich’, and ‘Bonus’) and three resistant (‘Lindarin 63’, ‘Wayne’, and ‘Cutler 71’) cultivars were tested. A spray containing benomyl (methyl 1‐(butylcarbamoyl)‐2‐benzimidazole carbamate) was applied to plant rows until runoff, once a week from 1 July until near plant maturity. Nonsprayed rows served as controls. The incidence of powdery mildew increased rapidly during July, and by the end of the month nearly all leaves of all susceptible cultivars were infected. Seed yield of the susceptible cultivars was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in benomyl‐sprayed than in nonsprayed plants: 9, 15, and 10% higher for Harosoy 63, Kanrich, and Bonus, respectively. Seed yield of the resistant cultivars was not affected by spraying with benomyl, indicating that the higher yield from spraying susceptible cultivars was only from the control of powdery mildew. The mean loss of yield caused by powdery mildew was 10.1%, which suggests that use of powdery mildew resistant cultivars by soybean producers in areas where powdery mildew occurs, would be beneficial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew rapidly infected nearly all leaves of susceptible soybean cultivars by late July.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of powdery mildewe0
Direction
increased rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of powdery mildew increased rapidly during July, and by the end of the month nearly all leaves of all susceptible cultivars were infected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl spraying increased seed yield of Harosoy 63 by 9% compared with no spray.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Harosoy 63e0
Treatment
benomyl‐sprayede0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9e0
Comparator
nonsprayed plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of the susceptible cultivars was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in benomyl‐sprayed than in nonsprayed plants: 9, 15, and 10% higher for Harosoy 63, Kanrich, and Bonus, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl spraying increased seed yield of Kanrich by 15% compared with no spray.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kanriche0
Treatment
benomyl‐sprayede0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15e0
Comparator
nonsprayed plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of the susceptible cultivars was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in benomyl‐sprayed than in nonsprayed plants: 9, 15, and 10% higher for Harosoy 63, Kanrich, and Bonus, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl spraying increased seed yield of Bonus by 10% compared with no spray.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Bonuse0
Treatment
benomyl‐sprayede0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10e0
Comparator
nonsprayed plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of the susceptible cultivars was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in benomyl‐sprayed than in nonsprayed plants: 9, 15, and 10% higher for Harosoy 63, Kanrich, and Bonus, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl spraying did not affect seed yield of resistant soybean cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
resistant cultivarse0
Treatment
spraying with benomyle0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield of the resistant cultivars was not affected by spraying with benomyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew caused a mean soybean yield loss of 10.1%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
loss of yielde0
Direction
losse0
Value
10.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean loss of yield caused by powdery mildew was 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest powdery mildew resistant cultivars would benefit soybean producers where the disease occurs.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
use of powdery mildew resistant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of powdery mildew resistant cultivars by soybean producers in areas where powdery mildew occurs, would be beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1358 · show in text ↑

benomyl · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 332 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

400 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.