Paper · 1976 · Crop Science

Effects of UV‐B Radiation on Net Photosynthesis of Some Crop Plants1

T. K. Van; L. A. Garrard; S. H. West

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
65
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Thirteen crop plants were subjected to an enhanced ultraviolet “B” (UV‐B) radiation (280 to 320 nm) regime that simulated a 0.19 atm cm ozone level, solar angle 55° (approximately 50% ozone depletion at 30° N latitude), to determine their susceptibility to photosynthetic impairment. As evidenced by net CO 2 uptake and dry weight measurements, these plants exhibited a wide range of response to enhauced levels of UV‐B radiation. These species were classified either as “sensitive” (pea, Pisum sativum L.; collard, Brassica oleracea L., var. acephala ; cabbage, Brassica oleracea L., var. capitata ; soybean, Glycine max L.; and oat, Avena sativa L.), “moderately sensitive” (tomato, Lycopersicum esculentum L.; sorghum Sorghum bicolor L.; rye, Secale cereale L.; and rice, Oryza sativa L.), or “tolerant” (corn, Zea mays L.; digitgrass, Digitaria decumbens Stent.; pearl millet, Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum.; and peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.) in respect to their sensitivity to UV‐B radiation. Plants grown in growth chambers with the same UV‐B enrichment but a lower irradiance of visible light (50 W.m ‐2 ) showed greater photosynthetic impairment than did greenhouse‐grown plants. This was postulated to be due to photorepair under greenhouse conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same UV-B enrichment, lower visible irradiance in growth chambers caused more photosynthetic impairment than greenhouse growth.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
lower irradiance of visible light (50 W.m ‐2 )e0
Outcome
photosynthetic impairmente0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
greenhouse‐grown plantse0
Setting
growth chamberse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown in growth chambers with the same UV‐B enrichment but a lower irradiance of visible light (50 W.m ‐2 ) showed greater photosynthetic impairment than did greenhouse‐grown plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1192 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed photorepair under greenhouse conditions as the explanation.

Taxon
crop plantst0
Outcome
photorepaire0
Qualifier
under greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“This was postulated to be due to photorepair under greenhouse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.