Paper · 2004 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Genotypic Variability in Drought Performance and Recovery in Cowpea under Controlled Environment

A. O. Anyia; H. Herzog

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Mid‐season drought is a factor frequently limiting crop production in the moist to dry savannah zones of the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Ten cowpea genotypes were subjected to a cycle of drought at flowering followed by re‐watering to study variation in drought performance and recovery. Drought caused a reduction in leaf assimilation rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance with genotypic variances of 75.4, 57.9, and 83.3 %, respectively. Only genotypic variance in stomatal conductance increased appreciably under drought. Reductions in leaf water potential as a consequence of drought positively correlated with a decline in assimilation rate, which was associated with stomatal closure. One week after re‐watering, the three gas exchange parameters of stressed plants recovered fully and attained values 10–30 % higher than the well‐watered plants with increased genotypic variability. Reductions in the total dry matter during the drought interval varied from 11 to 50 % among genotypes, but were of minor importance for the total dry matter at maturity. After stress, the gain in dry matter varied considerably among the stressed genotypes, with stressed plants showing higher gain than the unstressed plants during this interval. This was associated with increased availability of assimilates due to enhanced green leaf area duration after stress release. Variability in drought recovery among genotypes was found, and appears to be more important for final yield than responses during drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf assimilation rate in cowpea, with genotypic variance 75.4.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
leaf assimilation ratee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
75.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a reduction in leaf assimilation rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance with genotypic variances of 75.4, 57.9, and 83.3 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced transpiration rate in cowpea, with genotypic variance 57.9.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
57.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a reduction in leaf assimilation rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance with genotypic variances of 75.4, 57.9, and 83.3 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced stomatal conductance in cowpea, with genotypic variance 83.3 %.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
83.3 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a reduction in leaf assimilation rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance with genotypic variances of 75.4, 57.9, and 83.3 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic variance in stomatal conductance increased under drought.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
genotypic variance in stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only genotypic variance in stomatal conductance increased appreciably under drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-induced reductions in leaf water potential correlated positively with declining assimilation rate.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
assimilation ratee0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
Reductions in leaf water potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in leaf water potential as a consequence of drought positively correlated with a decline in assimilation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assimilation decline was associated with stomatal closure.

Organ / stage
stomatale0
Outcome
assimilation ratee0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
stomatal closuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decline in assimilation rate, which was associated with stomatal closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gas exchange parameters recovered fully one week after re-watering.

Treatment
re‐wateringe0
Outcome
three gas exchange parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Value
10–30 %e0
Qualifier
One week after re‐wateringe0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One week after re‐watering, the three gas exchange parameters of stressed plants recovered fully and attained values 10–30 % higher than the well‐watered plants with increased genotypic variability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic variability increased after re-watering.

Outcome
genotypic variabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the three gas exchange parameters of stressed plants recovered fully and attained values 10–30 % higher than the well‐watered plants with increased genotypic variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced total dry matter by 11 to 50% across genotypes.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
Reductionse0
Value
11 to 50 %e0
Qualifier
among genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in the total dry matter during the drought interval varied from 11 to 50 % among genotypes, but were of minor importance for the total dry matter at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-matter reductions during drought had minor importance for mature dry matter.

Outcome
total dry matter at maturitye0
Qualifier
minor importancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were of minor importance for the total dry matter at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stressed plants gained more dry matter than unstressed plants after stress.

Treatment
stressed plantse0
Outcome
gain in dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unstressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After stress, the gain in dry matter varied considerably among the stressed genotypes, with stressed plants showing higher gain than the unstressed plants during this interval.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced green leaf area duration after stress release was associated with greater assimilate availability.

Organ / stage
green leafe0
Outcome
availability of assimilatese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
enhanced green leaf area duration after stress releasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was associated with increased availability of assimilates due to enhanced green leaf area duration after stress release.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought recovery varied among genotypes and appeared more important for final yield than drought responses.

Outcome
Variability in drought recoverye0
Qualifier
more important for final yield than responses during droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variability in drought recovery among genotypes was found, and appears to be more important for final yield than responses during drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

52 papers: 9 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.