Paper · 1972 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effects of Vesicular‐Arbuscular Mycorrhizae on Growth and Phosphorous Content of Three Agronomic Crops

Nelroy E. Jackson; R. E. Franklin; R. H. Miller

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
68
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Several placements of vesicular‐arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal inoculum in soil were compared in a greenhouse study of the potential use of VA fungi for increasing yields of agronomic crops on low P‐status soils. Placement of VA mycorrhizal inoculum and rock phosphate was considered an integral treatment. Inoculation with VA fungi increased corn yields about 50% over the increases due to indigenous mycorrhizal fungi. Placements of inoculum in a layer 5 cm below the seeds or mixed with a 5‐cm layer of soil below the seeds were effective; while two other placements, with the seeds or in a band with rock phosphate, were ineffective in increasing yields. None of the treatments that used rock phosphate were as effective as concentrated superphosphate in increasing yields, which indicated that lack of P was still limiting plant growth in the rock phosphate treatments. There were no effects of VA mycorrhizal inoculation of soil on growth of soybeans ( Glycine max L. Merrill ‘Harosoy 63’) and only a minor effect on sudangrass ( Sorghum bicolor var. sudanense ) for the placements that were tested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VA fungal inoculation raised corn yield by about 50% beyond indigenous mycorrhizal effects.

Treatment
Inoculation with VA fungie0
Interactor
VA fungie0symbiont
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 50%e0
Comparator
indigenous mycorrhizal fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with VA fungi increased corn yields about 50% over the increases due to indigenous mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum placed in a layer 5 cm below seeds increased yields effectively.

Taxon
Three Agronomic Cropst0
Treatment
in a layer 5 cm below the seedse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Placements of inoculum in a layer 5 cm below the seeds or mixed with a 5‐cm layer of soil below the seeds were effective; while two other placements, with the seeds or in a band with rock phosphate, were ineffective in increasing yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Three Agronomic Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum mixed into a 5-cm soil layer below seeds increased yields effectively.

Taxon
Three Agronomic Cropst0
Treatment
mixed with a 5‐cm layer of soil below the seedse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Placements of inoculum in a layer 5 cm below the seeds or mixed with a 5‐cm layer of soil below the seeds were effective; while two other placements, with the seeds or in a band with rock phosphate, were ineffective in increasing yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Three Agronomic Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placement with seeds was ineffective in increasing yields.

Taxon
Three Agronomic Cropst0
Treatment
with the seedse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
ineffective in increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“two other placements, with the seeds or in a band with rock phosphate, were ineffective in increasing yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Three Agronomic Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placement in a band with rock phosphate was ineffective in increasing yields.

Taxon
Three Agronomic Cropst0
Treatment
in a band with rock phosphatee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
ineffective in increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“two other placements, with the seeds or in a band with rock phosphate, were ineffective in increasing yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Three Agronomic Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock-phosphate treatments were less effective than concentrated superphosphate for increasing yields.

Taxon
Three Agronomic Cropst0
Treatment
rock phosphatee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Nonee0
Comparator
concentrated superphosphatee0

Verbatim

e0

“None of the treatments that used rock phosphate were as effective as concentrated superphosphate in increasing yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Three Agronomic Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VA inoculation had no effect on soybean growth for tested placements.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Material
Harosoy 63e0
Treatment
VA mycorrhizal inoculation of soile0
Interactor
VA mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
growth of soybeanse0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no effects of VA mycorrhizal inoculation of soil on growth of soybeans ( Glycine max L. Merrill ‘Harosoy 63’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VA inoculation had only a minor effect on sudangrass growth for tested placements.

Taxon
sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Treatment
VA mycorrhizal inoculation of soile1
Interactor
VA mycorrhizale1symbiont
Outcome
sudangrasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only a minor effect on sudangrass ( Sorghum bicolor var. sudanense ) for the placements that were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“VA mycorrhizal inoculation of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–940 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 79 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 323 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

354 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.