Paper · 2002 · Plant Cell & Environment

Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence

T. C. Vogelmann; J. R. Evans

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
230
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chlorophyll fluorescence was used to estimate profiles of absorbed light within chlorophyll solutions and leaves. For chlorophyll solutions, the intensity of the emitted fluorescence declined in a log–linear manner with the distance from the irradiated surface as predicted by Beer's law. The amount of fluorescence was proportional to chlorophyll concentration for chlorophyll solutions given epi‐illumination on a microscope slide. These relationships appeared to hold for more optically complex spinach leaves. The profile of chlorophyll fluorescence emitted by leaf cross sections given epi‐illumination corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sections. Thus epifluorescence was used to estimate relative chlorophyll content through leaf tissues. Fluorescence profiles across leaves depended on wavelength and orientation, reaching a peak at 50–70 µ m depth. By infiltrating leaves with water, the pathlengthening due to scattering at the airspace : cell wall interfaces was calculated. Surprisingly, the palisade and spongy mesophyll had similar values for pathlengthening with the value being greatest for green light (550 > 650 > 450 nm). By combining fluorescence profiles with chlorophyll distribution across the leaf, the profile of the apparent extinction coefficient was calculated. The light profiles within spinach leaves could be well approximated by an apparent extinction coefficient and the Beer–Lambert/Bouguer laws. Light was absorbed at greater depths than predicted from fibre optic measurements, with 50% of blue and green light reaching 125 and 240 µ m deep, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epifluorescence estimated relative chlorophyll content through spinach leaf tissues, and the leaf cross-section fluorescence profile corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in leaf paradermal extracts.

Organ / stage
leaf tissuese1
Outcome
relative chlorophyll contente1
Comparator
chlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sectionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus epifluorescence was used to estimate relative chlorophyll content through leaf tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–794 · show in text ↑
e2

“corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–701 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluorescence profiles across spinach leaves peaked at a depth of 50–70 µ m.

Outcome
peake3
Value
50–70 µ me3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e3

“reaching a peak at 50–70 µ m depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–906 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluorescence profiles across spinach leaves depended on wavelength and orientation.

Treatment
wavelength and orientatione5
Outcome
fluorescence profilese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fluorescence profiles across leaves depended on wavelength and orientation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–870 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathlengthening in the palisade and spongy mesophyll of spinach leaves had similar values.

Organ / stage
palisade and spongy mesophylle4
Outcome
pathlengtheninge4
Qualifier
similar valuese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“Surprisingly, the palisade and spongy mesophyll had similar values for pathlengthening with the value being greatest for green light (550 > 650 > 450 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1189 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathlengthening in spinach leaves was greatest for green light.

Treatment
green lighte4
Outcome
pathlengtheninge4
Direction
greateste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“Surprisingly, the palisade and spongy mesophyll had similar values for pathlengthening with the value being greatest for green light (550 > 650 > 450 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1189 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light profiles within spinach leaves were well approximated by an apparent extinction coefficient and the Beer–Lambert/Bouguer laws.

Outcome
light profilese6
Comparator
Beer–Lambert/Bouguer lawse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e6

“The light profiles within spinach leaves could be well approximated by an apparent extinction coefficient and the Beer–Lambert/Bouguer laws”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light was absorbed at greater depths in spinach leaves than predicted from fibre optic measurements.

Outcome
absorbed at greater depthse7
Comparator
predicted from fibre optic measurementse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e7

“Light was absorbed at greater depths than predicted from fibre optic measurements, with 50% of blue and green light reaching 125 and 240 µ m deep, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty percent of blue and green light reached 125 and 240 µ m deep in spinach leaves, respectively.

Outcome
blue and green light reachinge7
Value
125 and 240 µ me7
Qualifier
50%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e7

“Light was absorbed at greater depths than predicted from fibre optic measurements, with 50% of blue and green light reaching 125 and 240 µ m deep, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1640 · show in text ↑