Paper · 1972 · Crop Science

Effects of Fungicide and Insecticide Seed Treatments on Germination, Stand, and Development of Cotton Seedlings1

Earl B. Minton

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

At standard germination temperatures (20 to 30 C), percent germination of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds was not increased by treatments containing cyano (methylmercuri) guanidine (Panogen 15) 3 , pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB), and O,O‐diethyl S‐2‐[(ethylthio) ethyl] phosphorodithioate (disulfoton) as compared the untreated check. Germination was reduced by some treatments containing PCNB and disulfoton used alone and in combinations. Germination at constant 18 C was not affected by any treatment. In field and greenhouse tests conducted at sub‐optimum temperatures, seedling survival was increased by Panogen 15 used alone and in combination with either PCNB or disulfoton or both as compared to the check. However, stands were not increased significantly by overcoating Panogen 15‐treated seeds with PCNB and disulfoton as compared to Panogen 15 used along. In field and greenhouse tests phytotoxicity ratings of seedlings were related to application of disulfoton. There was a slight increase in phytotoxicity ratings for treatments containing the three pesticides as compared to treatments with disulfoton or with the insecticide plus either of the fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At standard temperatures, pesticide treatments did not increase germination.

Treatment
treatments containing cyano (methylmercuri) guanidine (Panogen 15) 3 , pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB), and O,O‐diethyl S‐2‐[(ethylthio) ethyl] phosphorodithioate (disulfoton)e0
Outcome
percent germinatione0
Direction
not increasede0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent germination of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds was not increased by treatments containing cyano (methylmercuri) guanidine (Panogen 15) 3 , pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB), and O,O‐diethyl S‐2‐[(ethylthio) ethyl] phosphorodithioate (disulfoton) as compared the untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some PCNB and disulfoton treatments reduced germination.

Treatment
treatments containing PCNB and disulfotone0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination was reduced by some treatments containing PCNB and disulfoton used alone and in combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 18 C, treatment did not affect germination.

Treatment
any treatmente0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination at constant 18 C was not affected by any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panogen alone or combined with PCNB or disulfoton increased seedling survival.

Treatment
Panogen 15e0
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling survival was increased by Panogen 15 used alone and in combination with either PCNB or disulfoton or both as compared to the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PCNB and disulfoton overcoating did not significantly increase stands.

Treatment
overcoating Panogen 15‐treated seeds with PCNB and disulfotone0
Outcome
standse0
Direction
not increasede0
Comparator
Panogen 15 used alonge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stands were not increased significantly by overcoating Panogen 15‐treated seeds with PCNB and disulfoton as compared to Panogen 15 used along”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling phytotoxicity ratings were related to disulfoton application.

Treatment
application of disulfotone0
Outcome
phytotoxicity ratingse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytotoxicity ratings of seedlings were related to application of disulfoton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three pesticide treatments slightly increased phytotoxicity ratings.

Treatment
treatments containing the three pesticidese0
Outcome
phytotoxicity ratingse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
treatments with disulfotone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a slight increase in phytotoxicity ratings for treatments containing the three pesticides as compared to treatments with disulfoton or with the insecticide plus either of the fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 · show in text ↑

ethyl · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

disulfoton · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

insecticide · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.