Paper · 2012 · Ecosystems

Altitudinal Change in the Photosynthetic Capacity of Tropical Trees: A Case Study from Ecuador and a Pantropical Literature Analysis

Bärbel Wittich; Viviana Horna; Jürgen Homeier; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In tropical mountains, trees are the dominant life form from sea level to above 4,000-m altitude under highly variable thermal conditions (range of mean annual temperatures: <8 to >28°C). How light-saturated net photosynthesis of tropical trees adapts to variation in temperature, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and further environmental factors, that change along elevation gradients, is not precisely known. With gas exchange measurements in mature trees, we determined light-saturated net photosynthesis at ambient temperature (T) and [CO2] (A sat) of 40 tree species from 21 families in tropical mountain forests at 1000-, 2000-, and 3000-m elevation in southern Ecuador. We tested the hypothesis that stand-level averages of A sat and leaf dark respiration (R D) per leaf area remain constant with elevation. Stand-level means of A sat were 8.8, 11.3, and 7.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1; those of R D 0.8, 0.6, and 0.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 at 1000-, 2000-, and 3000-m elevation, respectively, with no significant altitudinal trend. We obtained coefficients of among-species variation in A sat and R D of 20–53% (n = 10–16 tree species per stand). Examining our data in the context of a pan-tropical A sat data base for mature tropical trees (c. 170 species from 18 sites at variable elevation) revealed that area-based A sat decreases in tropical mountains by, on average, 1.3 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per km altitude increase (or by 0.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per K temperature decrease). The A sat decrease occurred despite an increase in leaf mass per area with altitude. Local geological and soil fertility conditions and related foliar N and P concentrations considerably influenced the altitudinal A sat patterns. We conclude that elevation is an important influencing factor of the photosynthetic activity of tropical trees. Lowered A sat together with a reduced stand leaf area decrease canopy C gain with elevation in tropical mountains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stand mean light-saturated photosynthesis was 8.8, 11.3 and 7.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 at 1000, 2000 and 3000 m, without a significant altitudinal trend.

Taxon
tropical treest0
Outcome
A sate0
Direction
no significant altitudinal trende0
Value
8.8, 11.3, and 7.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1e0
Setting
1000-, 2000-, and 3000-m elevatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Stand-level means of A sat were 8.8, 11.3, and 7.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1; those of R D 0.8, 0.6, and 0.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 at 1000-, 2000-, and 3000-m elevation, respectively, with no significant altitudinal trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tropical Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stand mean leaf dark respiration was 0.8, 0.6 and 0.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 across the three elevations, with no significant trend.

Taxon
Tropical Treest0
Outcome
R De0
Direction
no significant altitudinal trende0
Value
0.8, 0.6, and 0.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1e0
Setting
1000-, 2000-, and 3000-m elevatione0

Verbatim

e0

“those of R D 0.8, 0.6, and 0.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 at 1000-, 2000-, and 3000-m elevation, respectively, with no significant altitudinal trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tropical Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among-species variation in photosynthesis and respiration was 20–53%.

Taxon
Tropical Treest0
Outcome
among-species variation in A sat and R De0
Value
20–53%e0

Verbatim

e0

“coefficients of among-species variation in A sat and R D of 20–53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tropical Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pantropical area-based photosynthesis decreased by 1.3 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per km altitude increase.

Taxon
tropical treest0
Outcome
area-based A sate0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
1.3 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per kme0
Setting
tropical mountainse0

Verbatim

e0

“area-based A sat decreases in tropical mountains by, on average, 1.3 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per km altitude increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“tropical trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pantropical area-based photosynthesis decreased by 0.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per K temperature decrease.

Taxon
tropical treest0
Outcome
A sate1
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per Ke0
Setting
tropical mountainse1

Verbatim

e0

“or by 0.2 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 per K temperature decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1464 · show in text ↑
e1

“area-based A sat decreases in tropical mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“tropical trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mass per area increased with altitude.

Taxon
tropical treest0
Outcome
leaf mass per areae0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
altitudee0

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in leaf mass per area with altitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“tropical trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Geological and soil fertility conditions and foliar N and P influenced altitude patterns in photosynthesis.

Taxon
tropical treest0
Compound
foliar N and Pe0
Outcome
altitudinal A sat patternse0
Setting
Local geological and soil fertility conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Local geological and soil fertility conditions and related foliar N and P concentrations considerably influenced the altitudinal A sat patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1695 · show in text ↑
t0

“tropical trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced photosynthesis and stand leaf area decreased canopy carbon gain with elevation.

Taxon
tropical treest0
Outcome
canopy C gaine0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Lowered A sat together with a reduced stand leaf areae0
Setting
tropical mountainse0

Verbatim

e0

“Lowered A sat together with a reduced stand leaf area decrease canopy C gain with elevation in tropical mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1922 · show in text ↑
t0

“tropical trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑