Paper · 1985 · Crop Science

Transpiration Rate and Water Use Effeciency of Soybean Leaves Adapted to Different CO2 Environments1

Raul Valle; J. W. Mishoe; J. W. Jones; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
51
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gas exchange rates were measured during podfill on leaflets of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Bragg’] plants grown in 330 (ambient) and 660 (high) μmol CO 2 −1 environments in outdoor growth chambers and rooted in a reconstituted profile of Arredondo fine sand (loamy, siliceous, hyperthermic Grossarenic Plaleudult). Carbon exchange rates (CER), transpiration rates (TR), leaf resistance ( r L ) and leaf temperature ( T L ) measured to investigate their diurnal changes. These parameters were also measured during midday periods at various CO 2 concentrations (90‐990 μmol CO 2 mol −1 ) to study the effects of adaptation to ambient and high CO 2 , environments on the subsequent response to CO 2 levels. The primary objective was to determine CO 2 effects on leaf water use and water‐use efficiency, an important question as global CO 2 continues to rise. Diurnal TR of leaflets grown and measured at high CO 2 levels was not different from TR of leaflets grown and measured at ambient CO 2 . Leaf temperature was approximately 1.5°C higher for the leaflets at the high CO 2 concentration; also, r L was higher throughout the day on these leaflets than r L of those at ambient CO 2 levels. Water use efficiency (WUE = CER/TRf) or leaflets at high CO 2 was about twice the WUE of leaflets grown and measured at ambient CO 2 . Transpiration rates of leaflets adapted to ambient or high CO 2 concentrations were not significantly affected by short‐term CO 2 changes. However, regardless of CO 2 level of adaptation, T L and r L increased as CO 2 increased. It was concluded that: (i) TR of the high CO 2 leaflets was similar that of ambient CO 2 leaflets because the increases in r L caused by high CO 2 were partially offset by increases in vapor pressure gradient between leaf‐to‐air caused by increased T L ; (ii) Leaves adapted to high CO 2 had higher WUE than leaves adapted to ambient CO 2 , mainly because of a two‐fold increase in CER.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 grown and measured leaflets had similar diurnal transpiration to ambient CO2 leaflets.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high CO 2 levelse0
Outcome
Diurnal TRe0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diurnal TR of leaflets grown and measured at high CO 2 levels was not different from TR of leaflets grown and measured at ambient CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 leaflets were about 1.5°C warmer.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
Leaf temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.5°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf temperature was approximately 1.5°C higher for the leaflets at the high CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf resistance was higher throughout the day under high CO2.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
these leafletse0
Outcome
r Le0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“r L was higher throughout the day on these leaflets than r L of those at ambient CO 2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 leaflets had about twice the water use efficiency of ambient CO2 leaflets.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
twicee0
Value
about twicee0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use efficiency (WUE = CER/TRf) or leaflets at high CO 2 was about twice the WUE of leaflets grown and measured at ambient CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short term CO2 changes did not significantly affect transpiration in either adaptation group.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
short‐term CO 2 changese0
Outcome
Transpiration ratese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transpiration rates of leaflets adapted to ambient or high CO 2 concentrations were not significantly affected by short‐term CO 2 changes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf temperature increased with CO2 regardless of adaptation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
T Le0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regardless of CO 2 level of adaptation, T L and r L increased as CO 2 increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf resistance increased with CO2 regardless of adaptation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
r Le0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regardless of CO 2 level of adaptation, T L and r L increased as CO 2 increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute similar transpiration to a vapor pressure gradient offsetting leaf resistance.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
TRe0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
increases in vapor pressure gradient between leaf‐to‐aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TR of the high CO 2 leaflets was similar that of ambient CO 2 leaflets because the increases in r L caused by high CO 2 were partially offset by increases in vapor pressure gradient between leaf‐to‐air caused by increased T L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute higher water use efficiency mainly to a twofold increase in carbon exchange rate.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
two‐fold increase in CERe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves adapted to high CO 2 had higher WUE than leaves adapted to ambient CO 2 , mainly because of a two‐fold increase in CER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–61 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.