Paper · 1975 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Chemical weed control in young peach trees

K Koffmann; J Kaldor

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of five residual herbicides and two mixtures of herbicides on tree and weed growth were studied in two trials over two consecutive seasons in a young peach orchard at Bathurst, New South Wales. In the first trial, dichlobenil at 4.5 and 9.0 kg ha-1 increased tree growth and suppressed weeds, but the residual effects of the low rate were short; simazine (2.2 kg ha-1), trifluralin (2.2 kg ha-1) and simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1) also reduced weed incidence but did not improve tree growth. In the second trial, terbacil (2.2 kg ha-1) and mixtures of diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) and terbacil at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ha-1 effectively controlled weeds, giving faster tree growth. Terbacil (1.1 kg ha-1) and diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) suppressed broadleaf but not grass weeds. Terbacil (1.1 kg ha-1) improved tree growth only in the second season; diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) did not affect tree growth. None of the peach trees displayed toxic symptoms. The main weeds present in the trial site were: Amaranthus powellii, Chenopodium album, Polygonum aviculare, Lepidium hyssopifolum, Lactuca serriola, Rumex acetosella, Sonchus oleraceus, Plantago lanceolata, Cynodon dactylon, Bromus sp, and Eragrostis sp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlobenil at both rates increased peach tree growth.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
dichlobenil at 4.5 and 9.0 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dichlobenil at 4.5 and 9.0 kg ha-1 increased tree growth and suppressed weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlobenil at both rates suppressed weeds.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
dichlobenil at 4.5 and 9.0 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dichlobenil at 4.5 and 9.0 kg ha-1 increased tree growth and suppressed weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–303 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low dichlobenil rate had short residual effects.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
residual effectse0
Qualifier
low ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the residual effects of the low rate were short”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine reduced weed incidence.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
simazine (2.2 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simazine (2.2 kg ha-1), trifluralin (2.2 kg ha-1) and simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1) also reduced weed incidence but did not improve tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin reduced weed incidence.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
trifluralin (2.2 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trifluralin (2.2 kg ha-1) and simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1) also reduced weed incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simazine and trifluralin mixture reduced weed incidence.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1) also reduced weed incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simazine, trifluralin, and their mixture did not improve tree growth.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
simazine (2.2 kg ha-1), trifluralin (2.2 kg ha-1) and simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simazine (2.2 kg ha-1), trifluralin (2.2 kg ha-1) and simazine (1 1 kg ha-1) plus trifluralin (1.1 kg ha-1) also reduced weed incidence but did not improve tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbacil at 2.2 kg ha-1 controlled weeds.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
terbacil (2.2 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“terbacil (2.2 kg ha-1) and mixtures of diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) and terbacil at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ha-1 effectively controlled weeds, giving faster tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron and terbacil mixtures controlled weeds.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
mixtures of diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) and terbacil at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixtures of diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) and terbacil at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ha-1 effectively controlled weeds, giving faster tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbacil at 2.2 kg ha-1 and diuron-terbacil mixtures gave faster tree growth.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
terbacil (2.2 kg ha-1) and mixtures of diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) and terbacil at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“terbacil (2.2 kg ha-1) and mixtures of diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) and terbacil at 1.1 or 2.2 kg ha-1 effectively controlled weeds, giving faster tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-rate terbacil suppressed broadleaf but not grass weeds.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Terbacil (1.1 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broadleaf but not grass weedse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Terbacil (1.1 kg ha-1) and diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) suppressed broadleaf but not grass weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron suppressed broadleaf but not grass weeds.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
diuron (1.1 kg ha-1)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broadleaf but not grass weedse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) suppressed broadleaf but not grass weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbacil at 1.1 kg ha-1 improved tree growth only in the second season.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Terbacil (1.1 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
only in the second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Terbacil (1.1 kg ha-1) improved tree growth only in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron did not affect tree growth.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
diuron (1.1 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diuron (1.1 kg ha-1) did not affect tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No peach trees displayed toxic symptoms.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae0
Outcome
toxic symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the peach trees displayed toxic symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–958 · show in text ↑

Terbacil · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile · weed · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

simazine · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

diuron · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

diuron · weed · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.