Paper · 2006 · Plant Pathology

Identification of Alternaria spp. on wheat by pathogenicity assays and sequencing

D. Mercado Vergnes; M.‐E. Renard; E. Duveiller; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. isolated from wheat leaves collected in regions where alternaria leaf blight has been reported was compared with that of IMI reference isolates of A. triticina and A. alternata using two durum and two bread wheat genotypes. To identify isolates putatively corresponding to A. triticina , morphological and DNA sequence analyses based on ribosomal DNA from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (ITS1, 5·8S rRNA gene, ITS2) and toxicity bioassays of culture filtrate were combined. Glasshouse inoculations provided reliable information to assess the pathogenicity of A. triticina isolates on wheat. Alternaria leaf blight symptoms were produced by the A. triticina isolates only on durum wheat cv. Bansi, while A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates were found to be nonpathogenic on the wheat cultivars tested. Alternaria triticina isolates were distinguished from other Alternaria species by Simmons and Roberts’ sporulation pattern 6 and two to three conidia per sporulation unit associated with primary conidia bearing long (> 7 µ m) apical secondary conidiophores. Phylogenetic analysis also proved effective at discriminating wheat‐pathogenic A. triticina from other nonpathogenic Alternaria species. Alternaria triticina isolates yielded longer ITS sequences than A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates, leading to clear‐cut differences as visualized with agarose gel electrophoresis. Additionally, only culture filtrates of A. triticina isolates caused nonspecific necrotic lesions on leaves of 3‐week‐old wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria triticina isolates produced leaf blight symptoms only on durum wheat cv. Bansi

Taxon
durum wheat cv. BansiTriticum turgidum subsp. durume1
Treatment
A. triticina isolatese1
Interactor
A. triticinaAlternaria triticinae1pathogen
Outcome
Alternaria leaf blight symptomse1
Comparator
A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolatese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. isolated from wheat leaves collected in regions where alternaria leaf blight has been reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alternaria leaf blight symptoms were produced by the A. triticina isolates only on durum wheat cv. Bansi, while A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates were found to be nonpathogenic on the wheat cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. alternata, A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates were nonpathogenic on the wheat cultivars tested

Treatment
A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolatese1
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae1other
Outcome
nonpathogenice1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alternaria leaf blight symptoms were produced by the A. triticina isolates only on durum wheat cv. Bansi, while A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates were found to be nonpathogenic on the wheat cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–871 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glasshouse inoculations gave reliable information on pathogenicity of A. triticina isolates on wheat

Interactor
A. triticinaAlternaria triticinae2pathogen
Outcome
reliable information to assess the pathogenicity of A. triticina isolates on wheate2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Glasshouse inoculations provided reliable information to assess the pathogenicity of A. triticina isolates on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria triticina isolates were distinguished from other Alternaria species by two to three conidia per sporulation unit

Interactor
Alternaria triticinaAlternaria triticinae3pathogen
Outcome
two to three conidia per sporulation unite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. isolated from wheat leaves collected in regions where alternaria leaf blight has been reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“Alternaria triticina isolates were distinguished from other Alternaria species by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–954 · show in text ↑
e5

“two to three conidia per sporulation unit associated with primary conidia bearing long”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1088 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetic analysis of ITS discriminated A. triticina from other nonpathogenic Alternaria species

Interactor
Alternaria triticinaAlternaria triticinae6pathogen
Outcome
effective at discriminatinge4
Comparator
other nonpathogenic Alternaria speciese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. isolated from wheat leaves collected in regions where alternaria leaf blight has been reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e4

“Phylogenetic analysis also proved effective at discriminating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1192 · show in text ↑
e5

“from other nonpathogenic Alternaria species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1266 · show in text ↑
e6

“Alternaria triticina isolates yielded longer ITS sequences than A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria triticina isolates yielded longer ITS sequences than A. alternata, A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates

Treatment
Alternaria triticina isolatese6
Outcome
ITS sequencese6
Direction
longere6
Comparator
A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolatese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. isolated from wheat leaves collected in regions where alternaria leaf blight has been reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e6

“Alternaria triticina isolates yielded longer ITS sequences than A. alternata , A. tenuissima and A. arborescens isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only culture filtrates of A. triticina isolates caused nonspecific necrotic lesions on wheat leaves

Treatment
culture filtrates of A. triticina isolatese7
Interactor
A. triticinaAlternaria triticinae7pathogen
Outcome
nonspecific necrotic lesionse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogenicity of Alternaria spp. isolated from wheat leaves collected in regions where alternaria leaf blight has been reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
e7

“only culture filtrates of A. triticina isolates caused nonspecific necrotic lesions on leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1578 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.