Paper · 1981 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Potentials of Cassava Peels as a Soil Amendment: I. Corn Growth

N. N. Agbim

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment, the peels were mixed with cattle dung (D) in different proportions and applied at rates up to 200 metric tons/ha to 4 kg of potted soil. Nitrogen, P, K, and Mg fertilizers (F) were added as a variable. The higher the rate of the CP + D mixture and the more the proportion of D in the mixture, the greater the yield for the first crop except that CP + D + F treatments did not increase yield when applied at > 150 metric tons/ha. Mixtures without F containing 50% CP or above, and CP with F at and above 100 metric tons/ha, gave higher yields with the second cropping. This suggests that preplant incubation beyond the 3 weeks used was desirable to obtain greater N mineralization during the first cropping. Over the two cropping periods, increasing rates of CP increased yields from 29% to 244% of the control, thus showing the value of CP as a soil amendment. Moreover, CP + F was generally as effective as CP + D and D + F combinations. This obviates the necessity for D which is relatively scarce in West Africa. The CP + D mixtures enhanced fertilizer efficiency with the first cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing rates of cassava peels increased corn yields from 29% to 244% of the control over two cropping periods.

Treatment
increasing rates of CPe2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
from 29% to 244%e2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Over the two cropping periods, increasing rates of CP increased yields from 29% to 244% of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures without fertilizer containing 50% CP or above gave higher corn yields in the second cropping.

Treatment
Mixtures without F containing 50% CP or abovee3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
with the second croppinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mixtures without F containing 50% CP or above, and CP with F at and above 100 metric tons/ha, gave higher yields with the second cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP with F at and above 100 metric tons/ha gave higher corn yields in the second cropping.

Treatment
CP with F at and above 100 metric tons/hae3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
with the second croppinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mixtures without F containing 50% CP or above, and CP with F at and above 100 metric tons/ha, gave higher yields with the second cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–688 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that preplant incubation beyond 3 weeks is desirable to obtain greater N mineralization during the first corn cropping.

Outcome
preplant incubation beyond the 3 weeks usede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“preplant incubation beyond the 3 weeks used was desirable to obtain greater N mineralization during the first cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP + F was generally as effective as the CP + D and D + F combinations.

Treatment
CP + Fe5
Outcome
effectivee5
Direction
generally as effective ase5
Comparator
CP + D and D + F combinationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“CP + F was generally as effective as CP + D and D + F combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP + D mixtures enhanced fertilizer efficiency in the first corn cropping.

Treatment
CP + D mixturese6
Outcome
fertilizer efficiencye6
Direction
enhancede6
Qualifier
with the first croppinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“The CP + D mixtures enhanced fertilizer efficiency with the first cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1212 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher the rate of the CP + D mixture, the greater the corn yield in the first crop, and more dung in the mixture increased this relation.

Treatment
rate of the CP + D mixturee7
Outcome
yield for the first crope7
Direction
greatere7
Qualifier
the more the proportion of D in the mixturee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“The higher the rate of the CP + D mixture and the more the proportion of D in the mixture, the greater the yield for the first crop except that CP + D + F treatments did not increase yield when applied at > 150 metric tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP + D + F treatments applied above 150 metric tons/ha did not increase corn yield.

Treatment
CP + D + F treatmentse7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
did not increasee7
Qualifier
when applied at > 150 metric tons/hae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a greenhouse study on corn ( Zea mays L.) to assess the potentials of cassava peels (CP) as a soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“The higher the rate of the CP + D mixture and the more the proportion of D in the mixture, the greater the yield for the first crop except that CP + D + F treatments did not increase yield when applied at > 150 metric tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–549 · show in text ↑

Manihot esculenta · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.