Paper · 1982 · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

The genus Eugenia L. (Myrtaceae) in southern Africa: the structure and taxonomic value of stomata

A. E. VAN WYK; P. J. ROBBERTSE; P. D. F. KOK

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
45
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The mature stomatal morphology of 11 southern African species of Eugenia, and also of E. uniflora L. (naturalized) and E. incerta Diimmer (a garden plant of unknown origin) has been studied by light and scanning electron microscopy. Leaves of all the species are hypostomatic and water-stomata are occasionally present. Two different stomatal types, X and Y, differing mainly in their cuticular ornamentation, were found in the southern African species. The grouping of species based on stomatal characters supports a previous grouping of species on the basis of periderm and seed characters. Conspicuous lipid bodies, usually present in the subsidiary cells, are limited to the southern African species. Although the subsidiary cells do not differ in shape and size from adjacent epidermal cells, their contents often have a higher tannin content than ordinary epidermal cells. The variable patterns of arrangement of the three to five subsidiary cells makes it difficult to identify the stomata with existing classifications based on mature topography. Thus, a new term ‘anomostaurocytic’ is proposed for the stomatal type found in the southern African species. Stomata of E. uniflora and E. incerta are paracytic and anomocytic respectively, and the cuticular ornamentation of their stomata differs from those of the southern African species. The view that E. incerta is not closely related to the southern African species is supported by differences in its cuticular ornamentation, lack of lipid bodies in the subsidiary cells, anomocytic stomata and prominent T-pieces at the guard cell poles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All examined Eugenia species had stomata on lower leaf surfaces, with occasional water stomata.

Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
hypostomatic and water-stomata are occasionally presente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of all the species are hypostomatic and water-stomata are occasionally present.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–319 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Southern African Eugenia had two stomatal types differing mainly in cuticle ornamentation.

Outcome
stomatal typese0
Value
Twoe0
Qualifier
cuticular ornamentatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Two different stomatal types, X and Y, differing mainly in their cuticular ornamentation, were found in the southern African species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal grouping supported earlier grouping by periderm and seed characters.

Outcome
grouping of speciese0
Comparator
previous grouping of speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The grouping of species based on stomatal characters supports a previous grouping of species on the basis of periderm and seed characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid bodies in subsidiary cells were restricted to southern African species.

Organ / stage
subsidiary cellse0
Outcome
lipid bodiese0
Setting
southern Africane0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Conspicuous lipid bodies, usually present in the subsidiary cells, are limited to the southern African species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–704 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsidiary cells often contained more tannin than ordinary epidermal cells.

Outcome
tannin contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ordinary epidermal cellse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“their contents often have a higher tannin content than ordinary epidermal cells.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–878 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable arrangements of three to five subsidiary cells made mature-topography classification difficult.

Outcome
patterns of arrangemente0
Value
three to fivee0
Qualifier
difficult to identifye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The variable patterns of arrangement of the three to five subsidiary cells makes it difficult to identify the stomata with existing classifications based on mature topography.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed anomostaurocytic for the southern African stomatal type.

Outcome
stomatal typee0
Qualifier
anomostaurocytice0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a new term ‘anomostaurocytic’ is proposed for the stomatal type found in the southern African species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. uniflora has paracytic stomata.

Taxon
E. unifloraEugenia uniflorae0
Outcome
Stomatae0
Qualifier
paracytice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia uniflora
Eugenia uniflora · TaxonBageense · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomata of E. uniflora and E. incerta are paracytic and anomocytic respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. incerta has anomocytic stomata.

Taxon
E. incertaEugenia incertae0
Outcome
Stomatae0
Qualifier
anomocytice0

Verbatim

e0

“Stomata of E. uniflora and E. incerta are paracytic and anomocytic respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal cuticle ornamentation in E. uniflora and E. incerta differed from southern African species.

Outcome
cuticular ornamentatione0
Direction
differse0
Comparator
southern African speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the cuticular ornamentation of their stomata differs from those of the southern African species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1345 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal traits supported E. incerta being distantly related to southern African species.

Taxon
E. incertaEugenia incertae0
Outcome
not closely relatede0
Comparator
southern African speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“The view that E. incerta is not closely related to the southern African species is supported by differences in its cuticular ornamentation, lack of lipid bodies in the subsidiary cells, anomocytic stomata and prominent T-pieces at the guard cell poles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1598 · show in text ↑