Paper · 2004 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Populations and functional diversity of bacteria associated with barley, wheat and canola roots

N. Z. Lupwayi; G. W. Clayton; K. G. Hanson; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We investigated the effects of field pea (Pisum sativum)-based crop rotations on endophytic bacteria in roots and surrounding soil of cereal and oilseed crops. Barley (Hordeum vulgare), wheat (Triticum aestivum) and canola (Brassica rapa) were each grown (a) following peas inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae, (b) following uninoculated peas or (c) in monoculture. At flagleaf (cereal) or flowering (canola) growth stage, populations of soil-extract agar (SEA)-culturable bacteria ranged from log 10 7.12 to log 10 7.82 cells g -1 soil dry weight in the bulk soil, log 10 7.15 to log 10 8.12 cells g -1 soil in the rhizosphere, log 10 7.77 to log 10 10.39 cells g -1 root dry matter (DM) on the rhizoplane, and log 10 5.56 to log 10 7.63 cells g -1 root DM in root interiors (endophytic bacteria). Differences between treatments in populations and functional diversity of bacteria depended on where the bacteria were sampled in the continuum from bulk soil to root interiors. This affected correlations with crop N and yield because these crop parameters were lowest in monoculture. Thus, populations of endophytic bacteria and functional diversity of rhizospheric bacteria were negatively correlated with crop N accumulation and yields. However, the diversities of endophytic and bulk soil bacteria were positively correlated with crop N and yields. Key words: Community-level physiological profile, crop rotation, substrates, endophytic bacteria, microbial functional diversity, rhizosphere

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culturable bacterial populations spanned the reported ranges across bulk soil, rhizosphere, rhizoplane and root interiors.

Organ / stage
root interiorse0
Outcome
populations of soil-extract agar (SEA)-culturable bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of soil-extract agar (SEA)-culturable bacteria ranged from log 10 7.12 to log 10 7.82 cells g -1 soil dry weight in the bulk soil, log 10 7.15 to log 10 8.12 cells g -1 soil in the rhizosphere, log 10 7.77 to log 10 10.39 cells g -1 root dry matter (DM) on the rhizoplane, and log 10 5.56 to log 10 7.63 cells g -1 root DM in root interiors (endophytic bacteria)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment differences in bacterial populations and functional diversity depended on sampling position.

Outcome
populations and functional diversity of bacteriae0
Setting
bulk soil to root interiorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between treatments in populations and functional diversity of bacteria depended on where the bacteria were sampled in the continuum from bulk soil to root interiors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop nitrogen and yield were lowest under monoculture.

Treatment
monoculturee0
Outcome
crop N and yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop N and yield because these crop parameters were lowest in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic bacterial populations correlated negatively with crop nitrogen accumulation and yields.

Interactor
endophytic bacteriae0other
Outcome
crop N accumulation and yieldse0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“populations of endophytic bacteria and functional diversity of rhizospheric bacteria were negatively correlated with crop N accumulation and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizospheric bacterial functional diversity correlated negatively with crop nitrogen accumulation and yields.

Interactor
rhizospheric bacteriae0other
Outcome
crop N accumulation and yieldse0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“functional diversity of rhizospheric bacteria were negatively correlated with crop N accumulation and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic bacterial diversity correlated positively with crop nitrogen and yields.

Interactor
endophytice0other
Outcome
crop N and yieldse0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diversities of endophytic and bulk soil bacteria were positively correlated with crop N and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk soil bacterial diversity correlated positively with crop nitrogen and yields.

Interactor
bulk soil bacteriae0other
Outcome
crop N and yieldse0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diversities of endophytic and bulk soil bacteria were positively correlated with crop N and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and canola roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–95 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

rotation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.