Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Grain Yield, Milling Quality, and Seed Viability of Rice as Influenced by Time of Nitrogen Application and Time of Harvest1

W. Seetanun; S. K. De Datta

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Since the development of high yielding tropical rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars like ‘IR8,’ attention has turned to the differences in grain quality among rice cultivars. In field experiments at the IRRI farm, we studied the optimum time for applying nitrogen to rice cultivars for maximum grain yield, highest milling yield, and maximum seed viability. We applied ammonium sulfate at 60 kg/ha N in the 1969 wet season and 150 kg/ha N in the 1970 dry season. We used the cultivars IR8, ‘IR20,’ ‘C4‐63,’ and ‘RD1’ in the 1969 wet season and IR8, IR20, ‘IR22,’ and RD1 in the 1970 dry season. Farmers in South and Southeast Asia grow these cultivars on millions of hectares. Split application of nitrogen increased grain yield over single basal application in some cultivars by minimizing lodging. Topdressing of nitrogen at heading increased the percentage of head rice (unbroken polished grains) which was associated with higher protein content under that treatment. IR22, whose percentage of head rice was higher than those of the other cultivars tested, showed no further increase in head rice with nitrogen topdressing. Based on maximum grain yield with highest milling recovery and seed viability, the best time for harvesting transplanted rice was between 30 and 42 days after heading in the wet season and between 28 and 34 days after heading in the dry season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen application increased grain yield over single basal application in some rice cultivars.

Treatment
Split application of nitrogene0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
some cultivarse0
Comparator
single basal applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split application of nitrogen increased grain yield over single basal application in some cultivars by minimizing lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen application minimized lodging in some rice cultivars.

Treatment
Split application of nitrogene0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
minimizinge0
Qualifier
some cultivarse0
Comparator
single basal applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split application of nitrogen increased grain yield over single basal application in some cultivars by minimizing lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing at heading increased head rice percentage.

Treatment
Topdressing of nitrogen at headinge0
Outcome
percentage of head ricee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topdressing of nitrogen at heading increased the percentage of head rice (unbroken polished grains) which was associated with higher protein content under that treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head rice percentage was associated with higher protein content under heading-stage nitrogen topdressing.

Treatment
that treatmente0
Outcome
percentage of head ricee0
Qualifier
higher protein contente0

Not reportedCompoundDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of head rice (unbroken polished grains) which was associated with higher protein content under that treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR22 had a higher head rice percentage than the other tested cultivars.

Material
IR22e0
Outcome
percentage of head ricee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other cultivars testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR22, whose percentage of head rice was higher than those of the other cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR22 showed no further increase in head rice from nitrogen topdressing.

Material
IR22e0
Treatment
nitrogen topdressinge0
Outcome
head ricee0
Direction
no further increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR22, whose percentage of head rice was higher than those of the other cultivars tested, showed no further increase in head rice with nitrogen topdressing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended wet-season rice harvest window was 30 to 42 days after heading for maximum yield, milling recovery and seed viability.

Outcome
best time for harvesting transplanted ricee0
Value
30 and 42 days after headinge0
Qualifier
wet seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on maximum grain yield with highest milling recovery and seed viability, the best time for harvesting transplanted rice was between 30 and 42 days after heading in the wet season and between 28 and 34 days after heading in the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1378 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended dry-season rice harvest window was 28 to 34 days after heading for maximum yield, milling recovery and seed viability.

Outcome
best time for harvesting transplanted ricee0
Value
28 and 34 days after headinge0
Qualifier
dry seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on maximum grain yield with highest milling recovery and seed viability, the best time for harvesting transplanted rice was between 30 and 42 days after heading in the wet season and between 28 and 34 days after heading in the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1378 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

148 papers: 129 positive, 19 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.