Paper · 2009 · Applied Entomology and Zoology

Effects of pollination by Melipona quadrifasciata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on tomatoes in protected culture

Mitsuharu Hikawa; Ryoichi Miyanaga

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
23
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To evaluate the pollination efficiency of a stingless bee, Melipona quadrifasciata, individuals originating from tropical and subtropical regions of South America were examined on tomatoes (cv. Momotaro 8) cultivated in a greenhouse in summer and autumn. We compared differences in the rates of foraged flowers, pollen weights foraged from anthers, rates of fruit set of tomatoes, seed number of tomato fruits and yields of tomato fruit weight between M. quadrifasciata and the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris. When the amount of tomato pollen was sufficient, there were no differences in pollination efficiency between the stingless bee and the bumblebee; however, the rates of foraged flowers, the rate of fruit set and the yields were significantly reduced in the stingless bee compared with the bumblebee when fertile tomato pollen decreased markedly during the hottest period of the summer. During this period, the rate of flowers foraged by bumblebees did not decrease, but the rates of fruit set, the seed number and the yields of tomato fruits decreased significantly in comparison with the other periods. It is known that tomato pollen production is inhibited at high temperatures; thus, we consider that the high temperatures in the greenhouse (average daily temperature higher than 28C) caused the extreme decrease in pollen production. These results indicate that M. quadrifasciata can be used as a suitable pollinator of tomatoes if sufficient amounts of fertile pollen are provided.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With sufficient tomato pollen, pollination efficiency did not differ between Melipona quadrifasciata and Bombus terrestris.

Interactor
stingless beeScaptotrigona posticae0pollinator
Second interactor
bumblebeee0pollinator
Outcome
pollination efficiencye0
Direction
no differencese0
Qualifier
When the amount of tomato pollen was sufficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scaptotrigona postica
Scaptotrigona postica · InteractorSintropepe · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the amount of tomato pollen was sufficient, there were no differences in pollination efficiency between the stingless bee and the bumblebee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

During the hottest summer period, Melipona quadrifasciata foraged fewer flowers than Bombus terrestris.

Interactor
stingless beeScaptotrigona posticae0pollinator
Outcome
rates of foraged flowerse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
during the hottest period of the summere0
Comparator
bumblebeee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scaptotrigona postica
Scaptotrigona postica · InteractorSintropepe · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rates of foraged flowers, the rate of fruit set and the yields were significantly reduced in the stingless bee compared with the bumblebee when fertile tomato pollen decreased markedly during the hottest period of the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

During the hottest summer period, tomato fruit set with the stingless bee was lower than with the bumblebee.

Interactor
stingless beeScaptotrigona posticae0pollinator
Outcome
rate of fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
bumblebeee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scaptotrigona postica
Scaptotrigona postica · InteractorSintropepe · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rates of foraged flowers, the rate of fruit set and the yields were significantly reduced in the stingless bee compared with the bumblebee when fertile tomato pollen decreased markedly during the hottest period of the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

During the hottest summer period, tomato yields with the stingless bee were lower than with the bumblebee.

Interactor
stingless beeScaptotrigona posticae0pollinator
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
bumblebeee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scaptotrigona postica
Scaptotrigona postica · InteractorSintropepe · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rates of foraged flowers, the rate of fruit set and the yields were significantly reduced in the stingless bee compared with the bumblebee when fertile tomato pollen decreased markedly during the hottest period of the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bumblebee flower foraging did not decrease during the hottest period.

Interactor
bumblebeesBombuse0pollinator
Outcome
rate of flowers foragede0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bombus
Bombus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Almbauer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During this period, the rate of flowers foraged by bumblebees did not decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

During the hottest period, tomato fruit set, seed number, and yield under bumblebee pollination decreased relative to other periods.

Interactor
bumblebeesBombuse0pollinator
Outcome
rates of fruit set, the seed number and the yields of tomato fruitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the other periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bombus
Bombus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Almbauer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of flowers foraged by bumblebees did not decrease, but the rates of fruit set, the seed number and the yields of tomato fruits decreased significantly in comparison with the other periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that greenhouse heat above 28C caused the extreme decrease in tomato pollen production.

Treatment
high temperaturese0
Outcome
pollen productione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
higher than 28Ce0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we consider that the high temperatures in the greenhouse (average daily temperature higher than 28C) caused the extreme decrease in pollen production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Melipona quadrifasciata is considered a suitable tomato pollinator when sufficient fertile pollen is available.

Interactor
M. quadrifasciataMelipona quadrifasciatae0pollinator
Outcome
suitable pollinatore0
Qualifier
if sufficient amounts of fertile pollen are providede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melipona quadrifasciata
Melipona quadrifasciata · InteractorThiago Mlaker · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. quadrifasciata can be used as a suitable pollinator of tomatoes if sufficient amounts of fertile pollen are provided”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1492 · show in text ↑