Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Vascular coating: a barrier to colonization by the pathogen in Verticillium wilt of tomato

Jane Robb; D. A. Powell; P. F. S. Street

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Massive infusion of conidia of Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthier induced synchronous secretion of vascular coating in the petiolar xylem vessels of resistant and susceptible tomato near-isolines. More coating formed earlier in resistant than in susceptible plants. In the susceptible plants secretion was delayed in colonized trapping site vessels, but initiated in surrounding uncolonized ones. Controls were infused with water. Samples were quantified by light microscope assay techniques at 18, 48, and 120 h postinoculation for the following parameters: (i) delayed coating effect, (ii) overall coating capacity, and (iii) ability of fungus to "escape" laterally from trapping site vessels. The results showed that susceptibility to Verticillium was absolutely correlated with the presence of the delayed coating effect in the plant and increased ability of the fungus to spread laterally. Treatment of inoculated resistant plants with an inhibitor of coating secretion resulted in conversion to the susceptible phenotype. The progeny of a genetic backcross for the dominant (Ve) and recessive (ve) alleles at the Ve locus (Velve × velve) were assayed for the same parameters as well as for disease resistance based on symptom expression. The results confirmed the previous observations and suggested that in tomato the delayed phenotype is recessive. The data strongly supports two hypotheses: (i) coating forms a barrier against fungal penetration and (ii) the timing of the coating response in trapping site vessels results, directly or indirectly, from expression of the Ve gene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium conidia induced synchronous vascular coating in resistant and susceptible tomato.

Treatment
infusion of conidiae0
Interactor
Verticillium albo-atrumVerticillium albo-atrume0pathogen
Outcome
secretion of vascular coatinge0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium albo-atrum
Verticillium albo-atrum · InteractorUSDA Forest Service - Northern and Intermountain Region · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Massive infusion of conidia of Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthier induced synchronous secretion of vascular coating in the petiolar xylem vessels of resistant and susceptible tomato near-isolines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant tomato formed more coating earlier than susceptible plants.

Material
resistante0
Outcome
coatinge0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
susceptible plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More coating formed earlier in resistant than in susceptible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–271 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible tomato had delayed coating in colonized vessels but coating began in surrounding vessels.

Outcome
secretion was delayed in colonized trapping site vesselse0
Direction
delayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the susceptible plants secretion was delayed in colonized trapping site vessels, but initiated in surrounding uncolonized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptibility correlated with delayed coating.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility to Verticilliume0
Qualifier
delayed coating effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“susceptibility to Verticillium was absolutely correlated with the presence of the delayed coating effect in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptibility correlated with increased lateral fungal spread.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
ability of the fungus to spread laterallye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“susceptibility to Verticillium was absolutely correlated with the presence of the delayed coating effect in the plant and increased ability of the fungus to spread laterally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibiting coating secretion converted resistant inoculated plants to a susceptible phenotype.

Treatment
inhibitor of coating secretione0
Outcome
susceptible phenotypee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of inoculated resistant plants with an inhibitor of coating secretion resulted in conversion to the susceptible phenotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Backcross data suggested the delayed coating phenotype is recessive in tomato.

Gene
Ve locuse1
Outcome
delayed phenotype is recessivee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in tomato the delayed phenotype is recessive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“dominant (Ve) and recessive (ve) alleles at the Ve locus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1134 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vascular coating was hypothesized to block fungal penetration.

Outcome
barrier against fungal penetratione0
Qualifier
coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coating forms a barrier against fungal penetration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ve expression was hypothesized to determine coating-response timing.

Gene
Ve genee0
Outcome
timing of the coating responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“timing of the coating response in trapping site vessels results, directly or indirectly, from expression of the Ve gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑

storage · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 30 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.