Paper · 1995 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Dry matter accumulation and partitioning and its relationship to grain yield in wheat

RG Flood; PJ Martin; WK Gardner

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Total crop dry matter (DM) production and its components, remobilisation of stem reserves, and the relation of these to grain yield were studied in 10 wheat cultivars sown at Walpeup, Boort, and Horsham in the north-western Victorian wheatbelt. Between sites, all DM components decreased in the order Horsham > Boort > Walpeup. Differences between Boort and Walpeup were not always significant. Total DM at anthesis for Walpeu,p and Boort was in a similar range, and less than that for Horsham. Yields increased in the order Walpeup < Boort < Horsham. When data from the 3 sites were combined, leaf, stem (excluding cv. Argentine IX), and total DM were related to grain yield. Within sites, ear DM at anthesis was related to grain yield. Grain yield for all cultivars at Horsham and Walpeup and 5 cultivars at Boort was greater than the increases in crop DM from anthesis to maturity, indicating that pre-anthesis stored assimilates (stem reserves) were used for grain filling. Post-anthesis decrease in stem weight was inversely related to grain yield only at Horsham, which supports the view of utilisation of stem reserves for grain filling at this site. At Boort and Walpeup there was a similar negative trend, but values for 2 cultivars at each site were outliers, which weakened the trend. The wide adaptability of the Australian cultivars used in this study may be related to the differential remobilisation of stem reserves at each site. A measure of yield stability, however, was not related to stem weight loss during the grain-filling period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All wheat dry matter components ranked Horsham above Boort above Walpeup.

Outcome
all DM componentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
Horsham > Boort > Walpeupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between sites, all DM components decreased in the order Horsham > Boort > Walpeup”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter differences between Boort and Walpeup were not always significant.

Outcome
all DM componentse2
Setting
Boort and Walpeupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between Boort and Walpeup were not always significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“all DM components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter at anthesis was similar at Walpeup and Boort and less than Horsham.

Outcome
Total DM at anthesise0
Direction
less thane0
Setting
Horshame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total DM at anthesis for Walpeu,p and Boort was in a similar range, and less than that for Horsham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased from Walpeup to Boort to Horsham.

Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Walpeup < Boort < Horshame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields increased in the order Walpeup < Boort < Horsham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sites, leaf dry matter related to grain yield.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When data from the 3 sites were combined, leaf, stem (excluding cv. Argentine IX), and total DM were related to grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–675 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sites, stem dry matter related to grain yield except in cv. Argentine IX.

Material
cv. Argentine IXe0
Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When data from the 3 sites were combined, leaf, stem (excluding cv. Argentine IX), and total DM were related to grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–675 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sites, total dry matter related to grain yield.

Organ / stage
total DMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When data from the 3 sites were combined, leaf, stem (excluding cv. Argentine IX), and total DM were related to grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–675 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within sites, ear dry matter at anthesis related to grain yield.

Organ / stage
eare0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within sites, ear DM at anthesis was related to grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–736 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Horsham and Walpeup, wheat grain yield exceeded dry matter increase from anthesis to maturity for all cultivars.

Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
greater thane0
Setting
Horsham and Walpeupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield for all cultivars at Horsham and Walpeup and 5 cultivars at Boort was greater than the increases in crop DM from anthesis to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Boort, wheat grain yield exceeded postanthesis dry matter increase in five cultivars.

Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
5 cultivarse0
Setting
Boorte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield for all cultivars at Horsham and Walpeup and 5 cultivars at Boort was greater than the increases in crop DM from anthesis to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield versus dry matter comparison indicates stem reserves contributed to grain filling.

Outcome
grain fillinge0
Qualifier
pre-anthesis stored assimilates (stem reserves)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that pre-anthesis stored assimilates (stem reserves) were used for grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem weight decline after anthesis inversely related to grain yield only at Horsham.

Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
inversely relatede0
Setting
Horshame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-anthesis decrease in stem weight was inversely related to grain yield only at Horsham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Boort and Walpeup a similar negative trend was weakened by outliers in two cultivars at each site.

Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
negative trende0
Qualifier
2 cultivars at each site were outlierse0
Setting
Boort and Walpeupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Boort and Walpeup there was a similar negative trend, but values for 2 cultivars at each site were outliers, which weakened the trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Post-anthesis decrease in stem weight was inversely related to grain yield only at Horsham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1068 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest differential stem reserve remobilisation may explain cultivar adaptability.

Outcome
wide adaptabilitye0
Qualifier
differential remobilisation of stem reservese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wide adaptability of the Australian cultivars used in this study may be related to the differential remobilisation of stem reserves at each site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1444 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield stability was not related to stem weight loss during grain filling.

Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
yield stabilitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A measure of yield stability, however, was not related to stem weight loss during the grain-filling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1552 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–166 · show in text ↑