Paper · 2004 · Plant Disease

First Report of Species of Colletotrichum Causing Leaf Blotch of Liriodendron tulipifera in Argentina

G. A. Lori; A. M. Alippi; S. Dimenna

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Since 1986, irregular, blotchy lesions of leaves and petioles of tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) have been observed each summer in the city of La Plata, Argentina. Leaf spots are initially 2 to 3 mm in diameter and water soaked, and then they become brown or black with faint chlorotic margins that are more noticeable on the adaxial surface. Lesions may attain a diameter of 12 mm. Veins and petioles may also be affected and lesions may coalesce, especially at leaf margins. Surface-sterilized pieces of necrotic tissue collected from eight sites in the La Plata area were plated on potato dextrose agar and incubated at 27°C. Two Colletotrichum species were consistently isolated from the lesions. Single-spore cultures were obtained and identified as C. acutatum (1) and C. gloeosporioides (4). When cultured on V8 medium, mycelial growth of C. acutatum was tufted and pale gray, and the reverse side of colonies was buff to cream or pale gray to tan, but never dark. Hyaline conidia were buff to rosy buff en masse and elliptical or elongated with abruptly tapering ends measuring 8.04 to 13.58 × 2.68 to 3 μm. Micromorphology of conidia were compared with C. acutatum “Herb IMI 232176” (1). C. gloeosporioides cultures were dark gray; their reverse was dark mouse gray to fuscous black. The cirrhus was peach to orange and hyaline conidia were oblong with rounded ends measuring 8.6 to 13.40 × 2.68 to 4.02 μm. Pathogenicity was verified on greenhouse-grown tulip trees and strawberry cv. Pájaro (Fragaria × ananassa) by spray inoculation with conidial suspensions of C. acutatum (10 7 /ml), C. gloeosporioides (10 6 /ml), and a mixture of both species (equal parts of each suspension). Controls were sprayed with sterile distilled water. Irregular, blotchy lesions of tulip tree appeared 30 days after inoculation. Anthracnose symptoms (3) were observed on strawberries 7 days after inoculation. In all cases, lesions produced by the mixture were larger than those obtained with individual species. The inoculated fungi were reisolated from lesions of all species tested, fulfilling Koch's postulates. No lesions were observed on control plants. Voucher specimens were deposited in La Plata Spegazzini Herbarium, Argentina as C. acutatum (LPS 47187) and C. gloeosporioides (LPS 47188); cultures of both fungi were also deposited as LPSC 795 and LPSC 796, respectively. C. acutatum and C. gloeosporioides cause Liriodendron leaf blotch in Argentina. Glomerella cingulata was previously reported affecting L. tulipifera (2), but to our knowledge, this is the first report of tulip tree as a host of C. acutatum. References: (1) B. J. Dyko and J. E. M. Mordue. No. 630 in: Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria. CMI, Kew, Surrey, UK, 1979 (2) K. Ito and T. Kobayashi. Bull. For. Exp. Stn. Meguro 146:1, 1962. (3) C. J. Ramallo et al. Plant Dis. 84:706, 2000. (4) J. A. von Arx. Phytopathol. Z. 29:413, 1957.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tulip tree leaf and petiole blotchy lesions were observed each summer in La Plata.

Taxon
tulip treee0
Organ / stage
leaves and petiolese0
Outcome
irregular, blotchy lesionse0
Setting
La Plata, Argentinae0

Verbatim

e0

“irregular, blotchy lesions of leaves and petioles of tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) have been observed each summer in the city of La Plata, Argentina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–170 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. acutatum was isolated from tulip tree lesions.

Taxon
Liriodendron tulipiferaLiriodendron tulipiferat0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
consistently isolated from the lesionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Colletotrichum species were consistently isolated from the lesions. Single-spore cultures were obtained and identified as C. acutatum (1) and C. gloeosporioides (4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Liriodendron tulipifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. gloeosporioides was isolated from tulip tree lesions.

Taxon
Liriodendron tulipiferaLiriodendron tulipiferat0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
consistently isolated from the lesionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Colletotrichum species were consistently isolated from the lesions. Single-spore cultures were obtained and identified as C. acutatum (1) and C. gloeosporioides (4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Liriodendron tulipifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tulip trees developed blotchy lesions after 30 days.

Taxon
tulip treee0
Treatment
spray inoculatione0
Outcome
Irregular, blotchy lesions of tulip treee0
Value
30 dayse0
Comparator
Controlse0
Setting
greenhouse-growne0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Pathogenicity was verified on greenhouse-grown tulip trees and strawberry cv. Pájaro (Fragaria × ananassa) by spray inoculation with conidial suspensions of C. acutatum (10 7 /ml), C. gloeosporioides (10 6 /ml), and a mixture of both species (equal parts of each suspension). Controls were sprayed with sterile distilled water. Irregular, blotchy lesions of tulip tree appeared 30 days after inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated strawberry developed anthracnose symptoms after seven days.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Pájaroe0
Treatment
spray inoculatione0
Outcome
Anthracnose symptomse1
Value
7 dayse1
Comparator
Controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pathogenicity was verified on greenhouse-grown tulip trees and strawberry cv. Pájaro (Fragaria × ananassa) by spray inoculation with conidial suspensions of C. acutatum (10 7 /ml), C. gloeosporioides (10 6 /ml), and a mixture of both species (equal parts of each suspension). Controls were sprayed with sterile distilled water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1752 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthracnose symptoms (3) were observed on strawberries 7 days after inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed inoculum produced larger lesions than individual fungi.

Taxon
Liriodendron tulipiferaLiriodendron tulipiferat0
Treatment
the mixturee0
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
individual speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all cases, lesions produced by the mixture were larger than those obtained with individual species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Liriodendron tulipifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculated fungi were reisolated from host lesions.

Taxon
Liriodendron tulipiferaLiriodendron tulipiferat0
Outcome
reisolated from lesionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculated fungi were reisolated from lesions of all species tested, fulfilling Koch's postulates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Liriodendron tulipifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No lesions occurred on control plants.

Taxon
Liriodendron tulipiferaLiriodendron tulipiferat0
Outcome
No lesionse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No lesions were observed on control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Liriodendron tulipifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report tulip tree as a host of C. acutatum for the first time.

Taxon
tulip treee0
Interactor
C. acutatumColletotrichum acutatume0pathogen
Outcome
host of C. acutatume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum acutatum
Colletotrichum acutatum · InteractorRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to our knowledge, this is the first report of tulip tree as a host of C. acutatum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2542–2624 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 33 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.