Paper · 2012 · Annals of Microbiology

Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions

Sajid Mahmood Nadeem; Zahir Ahmad Zahir; Muhammad Naveed; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
168
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Salinity is one of the major environmental threats for successful crop production, hampering plant growth due to the osmotic effect and nutritional and hormonal imbalances. The application of naturally occurring plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is an emerging technology aimed at ameliorating the negative impact of salinity. However, the results obtained in the laboratory can sometimes not be reproduced in the field. The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the effect of PGPR inoculation on seed germination in a saline environment under axenic conditions and on enhancement of the growth and yield of wheat under natural salt-affected field conditions. Wheat seeds were inoculated with pre-isolated strains of Pseudomonas putida , Enterobacter cloacae , Serratia ficaria , and Pseudomonas fluorescens and sown at different salinity levels (1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 dS m -1 ). Inoculation with these strains was found to enhance the germination percentage, germination rate, and index of wheat seeds up to 43, 51, and 123 %, respectively, over the uninoculated control at the highest salinity level. The potential of these PGPR for improving the growth and yield of wheat was also evaluated at two natural salt-affected sites. Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites. The inoculated plants also improved the nutrient status of the wheat plants. The inoculated plants had low sodium and high nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents. Our results show that such rhizobacterial strains may be used as an effective tool for enhancing plant growth under salinity stress and for maximizing the utilization of salt-affected soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased the germination percentage of wheat seeds by 43% over uninoculated controls at the highest salinity level

Treatment
Inoculation with these strainse0
Interactor
PGPRe2symbiont
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
43e0
Qualifier
at the highest salinity levele0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with these strains was found to enhance the germination percentage, germination rate, and index of wheat seeds up to 43, 51, and 123 %, respectively, over the uninoculated control at the highest salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat seeds were inoculated with pre-isolated strains of Pseudomonas putida , Enterobacter cloacae , Serratia ficaria , and Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–826 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased the germination rate of wheat seeds by 51% over uninoculated controls at the highest salinity level

Treatment
Inoculation with these strainse0
Interactor
PGPRe2symbiont
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
51e0
Qualifier
at the highest salinity levele0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with these strains was found to enhance the germination percentage, germination rate, and index of wheat seeds up to 43, 51, and 123 %, respectively, over the uninoculated control at the highest salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat seeds were inoculated with pre-isolated strains of Pseudomonas putida , Enterobacter cloacae , Serratia ficaria , and Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–826 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation increased the germination index of wheat seeds by 123% over uninoculated controls at the highest salinity level

Treatment
Inoculation with these strainse0
Interactor
PGPRe2symbiont
Outcome
index of wheat seedse0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
123 %e0
Qualifier
at the highest salinity levele0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with these strains was found to enhance the germination percentage, germination rate, and index of wheat seeds up to 43, 51, and 123 %, respectively, over the uninoculated control at the highest salinity level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat seeds were inoculated with pre-isolated strains of Pseudomonas putida , Enterobacter cloacae , Serratia ficaria , and Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–826 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculation significantly increased growth and yield parameters of wheat at two natural salt-affected sites

Treatment
Inoculation with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
two natural salt-affected sitese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“The potential of these PGPR for improving the growth and yield of wheat was also evaluated at two natural salt-affected sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR-inoculated wheat plants had improved nutrient status

Treatment
Inoculation with PGPRe1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
nutrient statuse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculated plants also improved the nutrient status of the wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR-inoculated wheat plants had low sodium content

Treatment
Inoculation with PGPRe1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
sodiume0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculated plants had low sodium and high nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1529 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR-inoculated wheat plants had high nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents

Treatment
Inoculation with PGPRe1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contentse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculated plants had low sodium and high nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1529 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial strains may be an effective tool for enhancing wheat growth under salinity stress

Treatment
rhizobacterial strainse0
Outcome
enhancing plant growth under salinity stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results show that such rhizobacterial strains may be used as an effective tool for enhancing plant growth under salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1662 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1360 · show in text ↑

inoculation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.