Paper · 1986 · New Phytologist

SYNTHESIZED ECTOMYCORRHIZAL ASSOCIATIONS Of SOME AUSTRALIAN HERBS AND SHRUBS

H. H. KOPE; J. H. WARCUP

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The morphology and development of ectomycorrhizas formed by Pezisa whitei (Gilkey) Trappe, Labyrvnthomyces sp. (Ascomycetes) and Laccaria ohiensis (Mont.) Singer (Basidiomycete) on a range of hosts including Pultenaea obovata Benth., Gompholobium latifolium Sm. (shrubs) and Poranthera microphylla Brongn., Angianthus tomentosus Wendl., Waitssia citrina (Benth.) Steetz and Stvlidium gratninifolium Sw. ex Willd. (herbs) have been studied in a gnotobiotic system in a soil mix low in available phosphate. The associations formed varied from mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths enclosing root apices on P. obovata and G. latifolium to less well-defined ones on the herbs, where associations varied from partial sheathing of roots to discrete patches of fungal sheath to no sheath at all in the association A. tomentosus + P. whitei. A Hartig net was formed in most associations although L. ohiensis formed none with P. microphylla, A. tomentosus and W. citrina. The results showed that the form of a mycorrhiza depended on both partners, not on the fungus or higher plant alone. All plant-fungus combinations except for A. fomentosus + L. ohiensis showed a significant growth response compared with non-inoculated plants, which indicated mycorrhizal effectiveness, irrespective of mycorrhizal form, in the growth conditions employed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pultenaea obovata formed mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths.

Taxon
Pultenaea obovatae1
Outcome
mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths enclosing root apicese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths enclosing root apices on P. obovata and G. latifolium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pultenaea obovata Benth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gompholobium latifolium formed mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths.

Taxon
Gompholobium latifoliume1
Outcome
mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths enclosing root apicese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizas with well-defined sheaths enclosing root apices on P. obovata and G. latifolium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gompholobium latifolium Sm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbaceous hosts had less defined and variable fungal sheaths.

Taxon
HERBSt0
Outcome
associations varied from partial sheathing of roots to discrete patches of fungal sheath to no sheath at alle0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“less well-defined ones on the herbs, where associations varied from partial sheathing of roots to discrete patches of fungal sheath to no sheath at all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“AUSTRALIAN HERBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Angianthus tomentosus with Pezisa whitei had no sheath.

Taxon
Angianthus tomentosusSiloxerus tomentosuse1
Interactor
Pezisa whiteie2symbiont
Outcome
no sheath at alle0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“no sheath at all in the association A. tomentosus + P. whitei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“Angianthus tomentosus Wendl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pezisa whitei (Gilkey) Trappe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A Hartig net formed in most plant-fungus associations.

Taxon
HERBS AND SHRUBSt0
Outcome
A Hartig net was formed in most associationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A Hartig net was formed in most associations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“AUSTRALIAN HERBS AND SHRUBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laccaria ohiensis formed no Hartig net with Poranthera microphylla.

Taxon
Poranthera microphyllaPoranthera microphyllae1
Interactor
Laccaria ohiensisLaccaria ohiensise2symbiont
Outcome
formed nonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poranthera microphylla
Poranthera microphylla · TaxonAusDigi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. ohiensis formed none with P. microphylla, A. tomentosus and W. citrina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“Poranthera microphylla Brongn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Laccaria ohiensis (Mont.) Singer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laccaria ohiensis formed no Hartig net with Angianthus tomentosus.

Taxon
Angianthus tomentosusSiloxerus tomentosuse1
Interactor
Laccaria ohiensisLaccaria ohiensise2symbiont
Outcome
formed nonee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“L. ohiensis formed none with P. microphylla, A. tomentosus and W. citrina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“Angianthus tomentosus Wendl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“Laccaria ohiensis (Mont.) Singer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laccaria ohiensis formed no Hartig net with Waitssia citrina.

Taxon
Waitssia citrinae1
Interactor
Laccaria ohiensisLaccaria ohiensise2symbiont
Outcome
formed nonee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“L. ohiensis formed none with P. microphylla, A. tomentosus and W. citrina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“Waitssia citrina (Benth.) Steetz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–369 · show in text ↑
e2

“Laccaria ohiensis (Mont.) Singer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–161 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal form depended on both plant and fungal partners.

Taxon
HERBS AND SHRUBSt0
Outcome
form of a mycorrhizae0
Qualifier
both partnerse0

Verbatim

e0

“the form of a mycorrhiza depended on both partners, not on the fungus or higher plant alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“AUSTRALIAN HERBS AND SHRUBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most plant-fungus combinations significantly improved growth over non-inoculated plants, except the Angianthus–Laccaria pairing.

Taxon
HERBS AND SHRUBSt0
Treatment
plant-fungus combinationse0
Outcome
growth responsee0
Qualifier
except for A. fomentosus + L. ohiensise0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“All plant-fungus combinations except for A. fomentosus + L. ohiensis showed a significant growth response compared with non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“AUSTRALIAN HERBS AND SHRUBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–76 · show in text ↑