Paper · 2001 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Co-inoculation withBacillussp. CECT 450 improves nodulation inPhaseolus vulgarisL.

M Camacho; C Santamaría; F Temprano; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The strain Bacillus sp. CECT 450 increased nodulation on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) when co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. This positive effect occured under controlled conditions on perlite-vermiculite, sand, or in a mixture of soil and sand. This increase was also observed in a field assay. Nodulation kinetic studies suggested that the synergistic effect is pronounced during the latter stages of cultivation. In contrast, the same bacteria co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 reduced nodulation on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Inoculation with Bacillus sp. CECT 450 alone had no effect on bean plants, but reduced root growth in soybean. The survival of Bacillus sp. CECT 450 on inoculated seeds was high, even when inoculated seeds were maintained for several months at room temperature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus with Rhizobium increased bean nodulation in controlled substrates.

Taxon
bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899e0
Interactor
Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899e0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. CECT 450e0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
controlled conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strain Bacillus sp. CECT 450 increased nodulation on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) when co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled conditions on perlite-vermiculite, sand, or in a mixture of soil and sand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bean nodulation increase also occurred in the field.

Taxon
bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899e1
Interactor
Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899e1symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. CECT 450e1symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione1
Direction
increasee0
Setting
field assaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increase was also observed in a field assay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus sp. CECT 450 increased nodulation on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) when co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–137 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nodulation synergy was pronounced later in cultivation.

Taxon
bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
latter stages of cultivatione0
Outcome
synergistic effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the synergistic effect is pronounced during the latter stages of cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–428 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus sp. CECT 450 increased nodulation on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) when co-inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus and Bradyrhizobium co-inoculation reduced soybean nodulation.

Taxon
soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)Glycine maxe0
Treatment
co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110e0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110e0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. CECT 450e1symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110 · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same bacteria co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 reduced nodulation on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–568 · show in text ↑
e1

“The strain Bacillus sp. CECT 450 increased nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus alone had no effect on bean plants.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Inoculation with Bacillus sp. CECT 450 alonee0
Interactor
Bacillus sp. CECT 450e0symbiont
Outcome
bean plantse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Bacillus sp. CECT 450 alone had no effect on bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus alone reduced soybean root growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Inoculation with Bacillus sp. CECT 450 alonee0
Interactor
Bacillus sp. CECT 450e0symbiont
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Bacillus sp. CECT 450 alone had no effect on bean plants, but reduced root growth in soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus survival remained high on inoculated seed stored for months at room temperature.

Taxon
Bacillus sp. CECT 450e0
Outcome
survival of Bacillus sp. CECT 450e0
Qualifier
several months at room temperaturee0

Verbatim

e0

“The survival of Bacillus sp. CECT 450 on inoculated seeds was high, even when inoculated seeds were maintained for several months at room temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–85 · show in text ↑

Martinezella tropici · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 323 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

354 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.