Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-inoculation enhanced soybean growth relative to negative control.

A claim from Isolation and evaluation of endophytic bacteria from root nodules of Glycine max L. (Merr.) and their potential use as biofertilizers · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation enhanced soybean growth relative to negative control.

Taxon
Glycine max L. (Merr.)Glycine maxt0
Treatment
co-inoculation of B. japonicum USDA110 and Bradyrhizobium sp. CPO4.24Ce0
Interactor
B. japonicum USDA110Bradyrhizobium japonicume0symbiont
Second interactor
Bradyrhizobium sp. CPO4.24Ce0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
negative controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co-inoculation of B. japonicum USDA110 and Bradyrhizobium sp. CPO4.24C enhanced plant growth, height (33.87 cm), root nodulation (69 nodules/plant) and N-fixation (3.10 µmol C2H4 h-1 plant-1) in comparison to the negative control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1521
t0

“Isolation and evaluation of endophytic bacteria from root nodules of Glycine max L. (Merr.) and their potential use as biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–133

Title

Isolation and evaluation of endophytic bacteria from root nodules of Glycine max L. (Merr.) and their potential use as biofertilizers

Arely A. Vargas-Díaz; Ronald Ferrera-Cerrato; Hilda V. Silva-Rojas; et al. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2019. doi:10.5424/sjar/2019173-14220

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-aeaee1f7fe74f5a352f5e2600fc64b2bf825e2e7da63dab0a9857eb6e4d4b720 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Bradyrhizobium · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Bradyrhizobium japonicum · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

46 papers: 43 positive, 3 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

349 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.