Paper · 2014 · Physiologia Plantarum

Nitric oxide is involved in integration of UV‐B absorbing compounds among parts of clonal plants under a heterogeneous UV‐B environment

Xiao Liu; Qian Li; Ming Yue; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In nature, ultraviolet‐B ( UV ‐B) radiation is highly heterogeneous, both spatially and temporally. Plants exposed to UV ‐B radiation produce UV ‐B absorbing compounds that function as a protective filter. For clonal plants under heterogeneous UV ‐B radiation conditions, integration among ramets can allow irradiated ramets to benefit un‐irradiated ramets by causing them to increase their UV ‐B absorbing compounds content. In this study, we evaluated integration between pairs of clonal ramets of Glechoma longituba under heterogeneous or homogeneous UV ‐B conditions. We determined the levels of UV ‐B absorbing compounds, nitric oxide ( NO ) and hydrogen peroxide ( H 2 O 2 ) and measured the activity of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase ( PAL ) in connected ramet pairs under homogeneous or heterogeneous UV ‐B conditions. Under heterogeneous UV ‐B conditions, the UV ‐B absorbing compounds content increased in leaves of irradiated and un‐irradiated ramets, but not in the connecting stolons. The NO content increased in irradiated and un‐irradiated leaves and stolons, but the H 2 O 2 content did not. Application of NO synthesis inhibitors and an NO blocker to irradiated ramets blocked the increase in UV ‐B absorbing compounds and PAL activity in un‐irradiated ramets. These results suggested that NO is involved in the integration process for UV ‐B absorbing compounds among ramets. Our findings suggested that a UV ‐B‐induced increase in NO transmits a signal to un‐irradiated ramets via the stolon, leading to an increase in PAL activity and UV ‐B absorbing compounds content. The internal translocation of signal enables members of clonal networks to function as a whole unit and to mount an efficient defensive response to localized UV ‐B radiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterogeneous UV-B increased UV-B absorbing compounds in irradiated leaves.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
leaves of irradiatede0
Treatment
heterogeneous UV ‐B conditionse0
Outcome
UV ‐B absorbing compounds contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under heterogeneous UV ‐B conditions, the UV ‐B absorbing compounds content increased in leaves of irradiated and un‐irradiated ramets, but not in the connecting stolons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterogeneous UV-B increased UV-B absorbing compounds in unirradiated leaves.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
un‐irradiated rametse0
Treatment
heterogeneous UV ‐B conditionse0
Outcome
UV ‐B absorbing compounds contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under heterogeneous UV ‐B conditions, the UV ‐B absorbing compounds content increased in leaves of irradiated and un‐irradiated ramets, but not in the connecting stolons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B absorbing compounds did not increase in connecting stolons.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
connecting stolonse0
Treatment
heterogeneous UV ‐B conditionse0
Outcome
UV ‐B absorbing compounds contente0
Direction
but note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under heterogeneous UV ‐B conditions, the UV ‐B absorbing compounds content increased in leaves of irradiated and un‐irradiated ramets, but not in the connecting stolons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO content increased in irradiated and unirradiated leaves and stolons.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
irradiated and un‐irradiated leaves and stolonse0
Outcome
NO contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NO content increased in irradiated and un‐irradiated leaves and stolons, but the H 2 O 2 content did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 content did not increase.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Outcome
H 2 O 2 contente0
Direction
did note0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NO content increased in irradiated and un‐irradiated leaves and stolons, but the H 2 O 2 content did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO inhibitors and blocker prevented the increase in UV-B absorbing compounds in unirradiated ramets.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
un‐irradiated rametse0
Treatment
NO synthesis inhibitors and an NO blockere0
Outcome
increase in UV ‐B absorbing compoundse0
Direction
blockede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NO synthesis inhibitors and an NO blocker to irradiated ramets blocked the increase in UV ‐B absorbing compounds and PAL activity in un‐irradiated ramets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO inhibitors and blocker prevented increased PAL activity in unirradiated ramets.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
un‐irradiated rametse0
Treatment
NO synthesis inhibitors and an NO blockere0
Outcome
PAL activitye0
Direction
blockede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NO synthesis inhibitors and an NO blocker to irradiated ramets blocked the increase in UV ‐B absorbing compounds and PAL activity in un‐irradiated ramets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer that UV-B-induced NO signals through stolons to raise PAL activity and absorbing compounds in unirradiated ramets.

Taxon
Glechoma longitubaGlechoma longitubat0
Organ / stage
stolone0
Compound
NOe0
Outcome
increase in PAL activity and UV ‐B absorbing compounds contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glechoma longituba
Glechoma longituba · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our findings suggested that a UV ‐B‐induced increase in NO transmits a signal to un‐irradiated ramets via the stolon, leading to an increase in PAL activity and UV ‐B absorbing compounds content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glechoma longituba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–518 · show in text ↑