Paper · 1984 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Fungicide effects on light leaf spot, canker, crop growth and yield of winter oil-seed rape

C. J. Rawlinson; G. Muthyalu; G. R. Cayley

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Field experiments with rape ovs Primor, Jet Neuf and Norli during 1979–83 tested the effects of benomyl, prochloraz, imazalil, thiabendazole, metalaxyl or triadimefon sprays applied at different times on disease, crop growth and yield. The principal disease in all experiments was light leaf spot ( Pyrenopeziza brassicae ). A single spray in autumn of benomyl or prochloraz at 0·5 kg a.i./ha consistently decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot and sometimes decreased stem canker ( Leptosphaeria macvlans ). Under severe disease conditions in cv. Primor an autumn spray of fungicide contributed more to disease control than a spray in spring; a decrease in light leaf spot incidence was detectable up to 8 months after application. The autumn spray maintained plant population density, increased leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate, earliness of flowering, and yield by up to 0·69 t/ha; an autumn + spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha. Effects on crop growth and yield were due to disease control not direct chemical stimulation of growth. Measurements of crop growth and population per unit area revealed the effects of fungicides more clearly than traditional disease assessments based solely on randomly selected plants. Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha) decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot throughout the growing season of a subsequent rape crop, with beneficial effects on plant population density, growth, flowering and yield. Electrostatically charged rotary atomizer and conventional hydraulic spray applications of fungicide were equally effective in disease control. A reduction to one quarter in dose rate of prochloraz and 100–fold reduction in amount of water carrier (125 g a.i. in 4·3 1/ha) when applied electrostatically in autumn or autumn + spring had similar effects on disease, crop growth and yield to those obtained with a conventional sprayer delivering 500 g a.i. prochloraz in 410 1/ha. Fungicides, spray timing and methods of application are discussed in relation to the epidemiology of light leaf spot and canker and the economics of disease control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

benomyl autumn spray decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot.

Treatment
benomyle0
Interactor
Pyrenopeziza brassicaePyrenopeziza brassicaee1pathogen
Outcome
incidence and severity of light leaf spote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single spray in autumn of benomyl or prochloraz at 0·5 kg a.i./ha consistently decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot and sometimes decreased stem canker ( Leptosphaeria macvlans ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The principal disease in all experiments was light leaf spot ( Pyrenopeziza brassicae ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

benomyl autumn spray decreased stem canker.

Treatment
benomyle0
Interactor
Leptosphaeria macvlanse0pathogen
Outcome
stem cankere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single spray in autumn of benomyl or prochloraz at 0·5 kg a.i./ha consistently decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot and sometimes decreased stem canker ( Leptosphaeria macvlans ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

prochloraz autumn spray decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot.

Treatment
prochloraze0
Interactor
Pyrenopeziza brassicaePyrenopeziza brassicaee1pathogen
Outcome
incidence and severity of light leaf spote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single spray in autumn of benomyl or prochloraz at 0·5 kg a.i./ha consistently decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot and sometimes decreased stem canker ( Leptosphaeria macvlans ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The principal disease in all experiments was light leaf spot ( Pyrenopeziza brassicae ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

prochloraz autumn spray decreased stem canker.

Treatment
prochloraze0
Interactor
Leptosphaeria macvlanse0pathogen
Outcome
stem cankere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single spray in autumn of benomyl or prochloraz at 0·5 kg a.i./ha consistently decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot and sometimes decreased stem canker ( Leptosphaeria macvlans ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn fungicide spray improved plant population density.

Treatment
autumn spraye0
Outcome
plant population densitye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autumn spray maintained plant population density, increased leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate, earliness of flowering, and yield by up to 0·69 t/ha; an autumn + spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn fungicide spray improved leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate.

Treatment
autumn spraye0
Outcome
leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autumn spray maintained plant population density, increased leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate, earliness of flowering, and yield by up to 0·69 t/ha; an autumn + spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn fungicide spray improved earliness of flowering.

Treatment
autumn spraye0
Outcome
earliness of floweringe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autumn spray maintained plant population density, increased leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate, earliness of flowering, and yield by up to 0·69 t/ha; an autumn + spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn fungicide spray improved yield.

Treatment
autumn spraye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0·69 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autumn spray maintained plant population density, increased leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate, earliness of flowering, and yield by up to 0·69 t/ha; an autumn + spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn and spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha.

Treatment
autumn + spring spraye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0–83 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The autumn spray maintained plant population density, increased leaf area index, dry matter, crop growth rate, earliness of flowering, and yield by up to 0·69 t/ha; an autumn + spring spray increased yield by up to 0–83 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimefon on stubble improved incidence and severity of light leaf spot in the next rape crop.

Treatment
Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
incidence and severity of light leaf spote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha) decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot throughout the growing season of a subsequent rape crop, with beneficial effects on plant population density, growth, flowering and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimefon on stubble improved plant population density, growth, flowering in the next rape crop.

Treatment
Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
plant population density, growth, floweringe0
Direction
beneficial effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha) decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot throughout the growing season of a subsequent rape crop, with beneficial effects on plant population density, growth, flowering and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimefon on stubble improved yield in the next rape crop.

Treatment
Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beneficial effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triadimefon sprayed on rape stubble at high dose rate (1 kg a.i./ha) decreased incidence and severity of light leaf spot throughout the growing season of a subsequent rape crop, with beneficial effects on plant population density, growth, flowering and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1527 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrostatic and hydraulic spray applications controlled disease equally effectively.

Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
conventional hydraulic spray applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Electrostatically charged rotary atomizer and conventional hydraulic spray applications of fungicide were equally effective in disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A lower prochloraz dose and water volume with electrostatic application had similar disease, growth and yield effects to conventional spraying.

Outcome
similar effects on disease, crop growth and yielde0
Value
125 g a.i. in 4·3 1/hae0
Comparator
conventional sprayere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction to one quarter in dose rate of prochloraz and 100–fold reduction in amount of water carrier (125 g a.i. in 4·3 1/ha) when applied electrostatically in autumn or autumn + spring had similar effects on disease, crop growth and yield to those obtained with a conventional sprayer delivering 500 g a.i. prochloraz in 410 1/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–2006 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oil-seed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 · show in text ↑

triadimefon · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

prochloraz · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

benomyl · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

triadimefon · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 85 positive, 8 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.