Paper · 1976 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

The quality and quantity of forage oats sown at intervals during autumn: effects of nitrogen and supplementary irrigation

RA Spurway; DA Hedges; JL Wheeler

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The quality and production of forage oats (Avena sativa cv. Acacia) sown on five occasions between late summer and late autumn was measured in an experiment near Armidale, New South Wales. Additional treatments were nil vs. 71 kg ha-1 nitrogen (N) and non-irrigated vs. supplementary irrigation. Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect plant establishment, or the dry matter or digestible organic matter production from any sowing. Plant establishment declined linearly in association with reductions in the mean ambient temperature during the ten days after sowing. Crops sown on February 25 and March 13 produced at least 35 per cent more forage (P < 0.05) with irrigation than dryland crops but with all later sowings the effect of irrigation was not significant. Early sown crops contained up to 36 per cent senescent leaf and 44 per cent dead leaf in August. Organic matter digestibility contents of green and senescent forage differed little and always exceeded 69 per cent, but that of the dead leaf was at times as low as 45 per cent. Equations are presented relating digestible organic matter available in irrigated and non-irrigated treatments to the length and mean temperature of the growth period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect establishment.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
plant establishmente0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect plant establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect dry matter production.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect plant establishment, or the dry matter or digestible organic matter production from any sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect digestible organic matter production.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
digestible organic matter productione0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly affect plant establishment, or the dry matter or digestible organic matter production from any sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant establishment declined with lower post-sowing ambient temperature.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Outcome
Plant establishmente0
Direction
declinede0
Setting
ambient temperaturee0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant establishment declined linearly in association with reductions in the mean ambient temperature during the ten days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased forage of February 25 and March 13 sowings by at least 35 percent.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
foragee0
Direction
moree0
Value
35 per cente0
Qualifier
February 25 and March 13e0
Comparator
dryland cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“Crops sown on February 25 and March 13 produced at least 35 per cent more forage (P < 0.05) with irrigation than dryland crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation effects were not significant in later sowings.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
effect of irrigatione0
Direction
not significante0
Qualifier
later sowingse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“with all later sowings the effect of irrigation was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early crops had up to 36 percent senescent leaf.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Outcome
senescent leafe0
Value
36 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“Early sown crops contained up to 36 per cent senescent leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early crops had 44 percent dead leaf.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Outcome
dead leafe0
Value
44 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“44 per cent dead leaf in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green and senescent forage digestibility differed little and exceeded 69 percent.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Outcome
Organic matter digestibility contentse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
69 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“Organic matter digestibility contents of green and senescent forage differed little and always exceeded 69 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead leaf digestibility fell as low as 45 percent.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Outcome
dead leafe0
Direction
as low ase0
Value
45 per cente0

Verbatim

e0

“that of the dead leaf was at times as low as 45 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Equations related digestible organic matter availability to growth-period length and temperature.

Taxon
forage oatst0
Outcome
digestible organic matter availablee0
Comparator
irrigated and non-irrigated treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Equations are presented relating digestible organic matter available in irrigated and non-irrigated treatments to the length and mean temperature of the growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

54 papers: 44 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

irrigation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 143 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.