Abstract
Meiotic irregularities increased in each of five advanced generation hexaploid triticale ( Triticale hexaploide Lart. (5)) with delayed planting. In addition, tillering capacity was reduced. Significant differences existed between genotypes, and a marked interaction occurred between genotype and planting date. Notwithstanding meiotic irregularities, production of normal pollen was reasonably good (70‐75%), and spikelet fertility was equivalent to that hexaploid wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed planting increased meiotic irregularities in five triticale genotypes.
- Taxon
- triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- delayed plantinge0
- Outcome
- Meiotic irregularitiese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meiotic irregularities increased in each of five advanced generation hexaploid triticale ( Triticale hexaploide Lart. (5)) with delayed planting”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed planting reduced triticale tillering capacity.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- delayed plantinge0
- Outcome
- tillering capacitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meiotic irregularities increased in each of five advanced generation hexaploid triticale ( Triticale hexaploide Lart. (5)) with delayed planting. In addition, tillering capacity was reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Meiotic and reproductive responses differed significantly among triticale genotypes.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences existed between genotypes”
t0“Hexaploid Triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotype interacted markedly with planting date in triticale.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“a marked interaction occurred between genotype and planting date”
t0“Hexaploid Triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal pollen production in triticale was 70–75% despite meiotic irregularities.
Verbatim
e0“Notwithstanding meiotic irregularities, production of normal pollen was reasonably good (70‐75%)”
t0“Hexaploid Triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Triticale spikelet fertility was equivalent to hexaploid wheat.
Verbatim
e0“spikelet fertility was equivalent to that hexaploid wheat”
t0“Hexaploid Triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.)”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.