Paper · 2021 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Autumn sowing of facultative triticale results in higher biomass production and nitrogen uptake compared to spring sowing

Lukas J. Koppensteiner; Katharina Obermayer-Böhm; Rea M. Hall; et al.

12
claims
32
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Climate change will decrease precipitation in summer for Central Europe. Consequently, summer drought will affect crops, especially when sown late. Studies reported superior yields of triticale compared to wheat under suboptimal conditions like drought. The worldwide importance of triticale, however, is low and research on this crop is scarce. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties in two consecutive growing seasons under temperate climate conditions in Central Europe. Autumn-sown facultative triticale showed slower development, earlier harvest dates, higher soil coverage early in the season as well as higher crop stand height, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N yield and N utilisation efficiency. Spring sowing of facultative triticale, however, resulted in a higher relative growth rate, N concentration and relative N uptake rate. Drought stress in the second season affected crop stand height, soil coverage, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N concentration, N yield, N utilisation efficiency, soil water content and soil mineral N content. Autumn-sown triticale showed better adaption to dry conditions compared to spring-sown triticale. Among varieties, cv. Agrano performed better under optimal and cv. Trimmer under suboptimal conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn-sown facultative triticale showed slower development than spring sowing.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Autumn-sowne2
Outcome
developmente2
Direction
slowere2
Comparator
spring sowingt0
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e2

“Autumn-sown facultative triticale showed slower development, earlier harvest dates, higher soil coverage early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“compared to spring sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn-sown facultative triticale had earlier harvest dates than spring sowing.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Autumn-sowne2
Outcome
harvest datese2
Direction
earliere2
Comparator
spring sowingt0
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e2

“Autumn-sown facultative triticale showed slower development, earlier harvest dates, higher soil coverage early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“compared to spring sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn-sown facultative triticale had higher soil coverage early in the season than spring sowing.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Autumn-sowne2
Outcome
soil coverage early in the seasone2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
spring sowingt0
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e2

“Autumn-sown facultative triticale showed slower development, earlier harvest dates, higher soil coverage early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“compared to spring sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowing of facultative triticale gave higher crop stand height, above-ground dry matter and crop growth rate than spring sowing.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Autumn sowingt1
Outcome
crop stand height, above-ground dry matter, crop growth ratee3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
spring sowingt0
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher crop stand height, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N yield and N utilisation efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“compared to spring sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Autumn sowing of facultative triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowing of facultative triticale gave higher N yield and N utilisation efficiency than spring sowing.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Autumn sowingt1
Outcome
N yield and N utilisation efficiencye3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
spring sowingt0
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher crop stand height, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N yield and N utilisation efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“compared to spring sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Autumn sowing of facultative triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring sowing of facultative triticale gave higher relative growth rate, N concentration and relative N uptake rate than autumn-sown triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Spring sowinge4
Outcome
relative growth rate, N concentration and relative N uptake ratee4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
Autumn-sowne2
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e2

“Autumn-sown facultative triticale showed slower development, earlier harvest dates, higher soil coverage early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–744 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spring sowing of facultative triticale, however, resulted in a higher relative growth rate, N concentration and relative N uptake rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress in the second season affected crop stand height, soil coverage and above-ground dry matter of triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Drought stress in the second seasone5
Outcome
crop stand height, soil coverage, above-ground dry mattere5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e5

“Drought stress in the second season affected crop stand height, soil coverage, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N concentration, N yield, N utilisation efficiency, soil water content and soil mineral N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress in the second season affected crop growth rate, N concentration and N yield of triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Drought stress in the second seasone5
Outcome
crop growth rate, N concentration, N yielde5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e5

“Drought stress in the second season affected crop stand height, soil coverage, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N concentration, N yield, N utilisation efficiency, soil water content and soil mineral N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress in the second season affected N utilisation efficiency, soil water content and soil mineral N content.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Drought stress in the second seasone5
Outcome
N utilisation efficiency, soil water content and soil mineral N contente5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e5

“Drought stress in the second season affected crop stand height, soil coverage, above-ground dry matter, crop growth rate, N concentration, N yield, N utilisation efficiency, soil water content and soil mineral N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn-sown triticale showed better adaptation to dry conditions than spring-sown triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
Autumn-sowne6
Outcome
adaption to dry conditionse6
Direction
bettere6
Comparator
spring-sown triticalee6
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e6

“Autumn-sown triticale showed better adaption to dry conditions compared to spring-sown triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1316 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Agrano performed better than cultivar Trimmer under optimal conditions.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Material
cv. Agranoe7
Treatment
optimale7
Outcome
performed bettere7
Direction
bettere7
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among varieties, cv. Agrano performed better under optimal and cv. Trimmer under suboptimal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1420 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Trimmer performed better than cultivar Agrano under suboptimal conditions.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee1
Material
cv. Trimmere7
Treatment
suboptimal conditionse7
Outcome
performed bettere7
Direction
bettere7
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a field experiment was conducted to investigate the development, growth, nitrogen (N) uptake and N utilisation of two autumn- and spring-sown facultative triticale varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–530 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among varieties, cv. Agrano performed better under optimal and cv. Trimmer under suboptimal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1420 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sowing time · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 6 positive, 10 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.