Paper · 2015 · Plant Pathology

Differential reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica in watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks

M. López‐Gómez; M. Talavera; S. Verdejo‐Lucas

16
claims
28
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments. Meloidogyne incognita showed higher reproduction than did M. javanica on watermelon and cucurbit rootstocks. The watermelon cultivars did not differ in host status when challenged with these two species and supported lower nematode reproduction than the cucurbit rootstocks. Rootstocks Lagenaria siceraria cv. Pelops and Cucurbita pepo AK 15 supported lower reproduction than did the squash hybrid rootstocks ( C. maxima × C. moschata ). Egg production increased ( P < 0·05) with a rising initial inoculum level ( Pi ) in the non‐grafted Sugar Baby but the reproduction factor Rf (eggs per plant/ Pi ) was similar at two Pi levels. The total egg production in the plants grafted onto squash hybrids RS 841 and Titan was greater ( P < 0·05) at the higher Pi , but the Rf values were lower. The development of field‐grown non‐grafted watermelon plants was significantly stunted in plots where nematodes were detected at planting. However, no differences were observed in plots with grafted plants. In plots with nematodes, non‐grafted and Titan‐grafted plants had similar yields that were higher than that of RS 841‐grafted plants. In the commercial plastic houses with grafted watermelon, the average Rf value was 42‐fold, confirming the high susceptibility of squash hybrids as rootstocks for grafted watermelon. The Titan–Sugar Baby combination was tolerant to M. javanica .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne incognita showed higher reproduction than M. javanica on watermelon and cucurbit rootstocks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
Outcome
reproductione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
M. javanicae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Meloidogyne incognita showed higher reproduction than did M. javanica on watermelon and cucurbit rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–266 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon cultivars did not differ in host status when challenged with M. incognita and M. javanica.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse3
Material
watermelon cultivarse3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
Outcome
host statuse3
Direction
did not differe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“The watermelon cultivars did not differ in host status when challenged with these two species and supported lower nematode reproduction than the cucurbit rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon cultivars supported lower nematode reproduction than cucurbit rootstocks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse3
Material
watermelon cultivarse3
Outcome
nematode reproductione3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
cucurbit rootstockse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The watermelon cultivars did not differ in host status when challenged with these two species and supported lower nematode reproduction than the cucurbit rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lagenaria siceraria cv. Pelops supported lower reproduction than squash hybrid rootstocks.

Taxon
Lagenaria sicerariaLagenaria sicerariae4
Material
Pelopse4
Outcome
reproductione4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
squash hybrid rootstockse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lagenaria siceraria
Lagenaria siceraria · Taxon撮影者はカールおじさんです。 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rootstocks Lagenaria siceraria cv. Pelops and Cucurbita pepo AK 15 supported lower reproduction than did the squash hybrid rootstocks ( C. maxima × C. moschata )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucurbita pepo AK 15 supported lower reproduction than squash hybrid rootstocks.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepoCucurbita pepoe4
Material
AK 15e4
Outcome
reproductione4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
squash hybrid rootstockse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rootstocks Lagenaria siceraria cv. Pelops and Cucurbita pepo AK 15 supported lower reproduction than did the squash hybrid rootstocks ( C. maxima × C. moschata )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg production increased with a rising initial inoculum level in non-grafted Sugar Baby watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Sugar Babye5
Treatment
rising initial inoculum levele5
Outcome
Egg productione5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“Egg production increased ( P < 0·05) with a rising initial inoculum level ( Pi ) in the non‐grafted Sugar Baby”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reproduction factor Rf was similar at two Pi levels in non-grafted Sugar Baby watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Sugar Babye5
Treatment
initial inoculum levele5
Outcome
reproduction factor Rf (eggs per plant/ Pi )e6
Direction
similare6
Comparator
two Pi levelse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“Egg production increased ( P < 0·05) with a rising initial inoculum level ( Pi ) in the non‐grafted Sugar Baby”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–707 · show in text ↑
e6

“but the reproduction factor Rf (eggs per plant/ Pi ) was similar at two Pi levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total egg production was greater at the higher Pi in watermelon grafted onto squash hybrid RS 841.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
RS 841e7
Treatment
higher Pie7
Outcome
total egg productione7
Direction
greatere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“The total egg production in the plants grafted onto squash hybrids RS 841 and Titan was greater ( P < 0·05) at the higher Pi , but the Rf values were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total egg production was greater at the higher Pi in watermelon grafted onto squash hybrid Titan.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Titane7
Treatment
higher Pie7
Outcome
total egg productione7
Direction
greatere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“The total egg production in the plants grafted onto squash hybrids RS 841 and Titan was greater ( P < 0·05) at the higher Pi , but the Rf values were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rf values were lower at the higher Pi in watermelon grafted onto squash hybrid RS 841.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
RS 841e7
Treatment
higher Pie7
Outcome
Rf valuese7
Direction
lowere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“The total egg production in the plants grafted onto squash hybrids RS 841 and Titan was greater ( P < 0·05) at the higher Pi , but the Rf values were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rf values were lower at the higher Pi in watermelon grafted onto squash hybrid Titan.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Titane7
Treatment
higher Pie7
Outcome
Rf valuese7
Direction
lowere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e7

“The total egg production in the plants grafted onto squash hybrids RS 841 and Titan was greater ( P < 0·05) at the higher Pi , but the Rf values were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In field plots, non-grafted watermelon development was significantly stunted where nematodes were detected at planting.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse2
Treatment
nematodes were detected at plantinge2
Interactor
nematodesNematodae2pathogen
Outcome
developmente2
Direction
stuntede2
Setting
plotse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“The development of field‐grown non‐grafted watermelon plants was significantly stunted in plots where nematodes were detected at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No differences in watermelon development were observed in plots with grafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse2
Treatment
grafted plantse3
Outcome
developmente2
Direction
no differencese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The development of field‐grown non‐grafted watermelon plants was significantly stunted in plots where nematodes were detected at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1085 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, no differences were observed in plots with grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In plots with nematodes, non-grafted and Titan-grafted plants had similar yields that were higher than RS 841-grafted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Titane2
Treatment
plots with nematodese2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
RS 841‐grafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“In plots with nematodes, non‐grafted and Titan‐grafted plants had similar yields that were higher than that of RS 841‐grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1287 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In commercial plastic houses with grafted watermelon, the average Rf value was 42-fold, indicating high susceptibility of squash hybrid rootstocks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
squash hybridse0
Outcome
average Rf valuee0
Value
42‐folde0
Setting
commercial plastic housese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the commercial plastic houses with grafted watermelon, the average Rf value was 42‐fold, confirming the high susceptibility of squash hybrids as rootstocks for grafted watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Titan–Sugar Baby combination was tolerant to M. javanica.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Titan–Sugar Baby combinatione2
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pathogen
Outcome
tolerante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The suitability of watermelon cultivars and cucurbit rootstocks as hosts to Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica was determined in pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Titan–Sugar Baby combination was tolerant to M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1532 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · pest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.