Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production

W. L. Alexander; D. A. Bucks; R. A. Backhaus

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Agricultural crops with low water requirements and drought tolerance are needed for semiarid irrigation regions. Guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] is promising as a crop for producing food‐thickening agents and fluid additives for the oil drilling industry. The effects of irrigation timing, cultivar, and plant population on water use, growth, and yield of guar were investigated at Maricopa, AZ, on a Mohall sandy loam soil (fine‐loamy, mixed, hyperthermic Typic Haplargid) with a water salinity of 1.1 dS m −1 total dissolved salts over a 2‐yr period. Variables were: six irrigation levels (one to four irrigations based on physiological plant growth stages), three cultivars (‘Kinman’, ‘Santa Cruz’, and ‘Lewis’), and three populations (78, 26, and 13 plants m −2 ). Three post‐establishment irrigations—one before flowering, one during initial pod development, and one at mid‐pod filling—were optimal. Four irrigations maximized vegetative growth but reduced seed production per unit of water use; two irrigations lowered growth, seed yield, and water use efficiency. Seed yields averaged 1567, 1650, and 1830 kg ha −1 for Kinman, Santa Cruz, and Lewis, respectively. Seasonal evapotranspiration was 400 mm on the optimal seed production treatments, and water use efficiencies were as high as 0.64 kg seed m −3 in 1983, and 0.41 kg seed m −3 in 1984. The newer Lewis has the potential for higher yields, in addition to being an attractive, low water‐use summer crop for the southwestern United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three post-establishment irrigations, before flowering, at initial pod development and at mid-pod filling, were optimal for guar.

Outcome
post‐establishment irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Three post‐establishment irrigations—one before flowering, one during initial pod development, and one at mid‐pod filling—were optimal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations maximized vegetative growth of guar.

Treatment
Four irrigationse1
Outcome
vegetative growthe1
Direction
maximizede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four irrigations maximized vegetative growth but reduced seed production per unit of water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations reduced seed production per unit of water use.

Treatment
Four irrigationse1
Outcome
seed production per unit of water usee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four irrigations maximized vegetative growth but reduced seed production per unit of water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations lowered growth, seed yield and water use efficiency of guar.

Treatment
two irrigationse2
Outcome
growth, seed yield, and water use efficiencye2
Direction
lowerede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“two irrigations lowered growth, seed yield, and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yields averaged 1567, 1650 and 1830 kg/ha for Kinman, Santa Cruz and Lewis.

Material
Kinman, Santa Cruz, and Lewise3
Outcome
Seed yieldse3
Value
1567, 1650, and 1830 kg ha −1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed yields averaged 1567, 1650, and 1830 kg ha −1 for Kinman, Santa Cruz, and Lewis, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The newer Lewis cultivar has potential for higher guar yields.

Material
Lewise4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
potentiale4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“The newer Lewis has the potential for higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal evapotranspiration of guar was 400 mm on the optimal seed production treatments.

Outcome
Seasonal evapotranspiratione5
Value
400 mme5
Qualifier
optimal seed production treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“Seasonal evapotranspiration was 400 mm on the optimal seed production treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1270 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guar water use efficiency reached 0.64 kg seed m−3 in 1983.

Outcome
water use efficienciese6
Value
0.64 kg seed m −3e6
Qualifier
in 1983e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“water use efficiencies were as high as 0.64 kg seed m −3 in 1983, and 0.41 kg seed m −3 in 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1371 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guar water use efficiency reached 0.41 kg seed m−3 in 1984.

Outcome
water use efficienciese6
Value
0.41 kg seed m −3e6
Qualifier
in 1984e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigation Water Management for Guar Seed Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“water use efficiencies were as high as 0.64 kg seed m −3 in 1983, and 0.41 kg seed m −3 in 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1371 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.