Paper · 1996 · Photochemistry and Photobiology

Effects of Solar UVB Radiation on Growth, Flowering and Yield of Central and Southern European Maize Cultivars (Zea mays L.)

M. Saile‐Mark; M. Tevini; U. Mark

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
51
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract— Different cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.) originating from Central and South Europe were grown from June to September 1994 for 16 weeks in two greenhouses covered with different UVB‐absorbing (280–320 nm) plastic foils. Using the ambient UVB radiation level of a southern location (Portugal, 38.7°N) in one of the greenhouses as an enhanced radiation compared to the reduced radiation in the second greenhouse, an increase of about 12% of UVB was simulated. Six of the eight cultivars examined showed significant reductions in height of up to 18.9% at all developmental stages under increased UVB. In contrast to this, the fresh and dry weight as well as the leaf area was reduced under UVB only at early developmental stages, but with ongoing development the UVB stressed plants caught up. The total content of absorbing compounds of the maize cultivars was completely unaffected by UVB. A flowering delay up to a maximum of 5 days was observed under higher UVB in several cultivars. Probably due to this delay in the cob development the yield decreased to 27.7% under higher UVB at the first harvest after 12 and 14 weeks, whereas at the second harvest after 14 and 16 weeks yield reduction levelled off.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Height fell by up to 18.9% in six of eight cultivars under increased UVB at all developmental stages.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
increased UVBe0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
up to 18.9%e0
Qualifier
Six of the eight cultivars examinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six of the eight cultivars examined showed significant reductions in height of up to 18.9% at all developmental stages under increased UVB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dry weight fell under UVB only at early stages, after which stressed plants caught up.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
UVBe0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only at early developmental stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fresh and dry weight as well as the leaf area was reduced under UVB only at early developmental stages, but with ongoing development the UVB stressed plants caught up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area fell under UVB only at early stages, after which stressed plants caught up.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
UVBe0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only at early developmental stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fresh and dry weight as well as the leaf area was reduced under UVB only at early developmental stages, but with ongoing development the UVB stressed plants caught up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB did not affect total content of absorbing compounds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
UVBe0
Outcome
total content of absorbing compoundse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total content of absorbing compounds of the maize cultivars was completely unaffected by UVB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher UVB delayed flowering by up to five days in several cultivars.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
higher UVBe0
Outcome
flowering delaye0
Direction
delaye0
Value
5 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A flowering delay up to a maximum of 5 days was observed under higher UVB in several cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher UVB reduced yield to 27.7% at the first harvest after 12 and 14 weeks.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
higher UVBe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.7%e0
Qualifier
at the first harvest after 12 and 14 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield decreased to 27.7% under higher UVB at the first harvest after 12 and 14 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction levelled off at the second harvest after 14 and 16 weeks.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
levelled offe0
Qualifier
second harvest after 14 and 16 weekse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the second harvest after 14 and 16 weeks yield reduction levelled off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of maize ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑

uv · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

uv · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

uv · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 9 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

uv · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
    UV-B treatment delayed maize flowering by 2–3 days.

    Contents and Index to Volume 82 · 1998 · compared with plants grown under PAR light

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.