Paper · 1990 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Das optimale N‐Angebot im Frühjahr bei unterschiedlicher Keimdichte von Winterweizen

J. Wollring

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat The influence of plant density (plt./m 2 ) on the optimal N‐supply in spring (N min ‐content + N‐fertilization) has been tested at three sites. The different plant density was produced by different seed rates in autumn of about 150, 250, 350, 450 and 550 grains/m 2 . The N‐supply in spring was ‐ apart from a non‐fertilized field (N min ‐content) 80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 kg N/ha. Additionally, 80 kg N/ha were applicated as N‐topdressing. Moreover the optimal N‐supply in spring has been tested on a winter wheat field thinned out due to winterkilling. In detail we got the following results: 1. The reduction of the N min ‐content due to the N‐uptake by the plants slowed down in accordance with minor plant density. 2. The same N‐supply in the soil produced a higher N‐supply per individual plant in accordance with decreasing plant density and lead to a considerable increase of N‐nutrition. 3. Thin crops showed a higher tillering. The differences in plant density between 150 and 550 plt./m 2 in spring diminished to about 90 ears/m 2 at harvest. 4. Independently of plant density the maximum yield was obtained by a N‐supply (N min + N‐fertilization) in spring of about 120 kg/ha N. Due to the abundant N‐nutrition of the individual plants and the minor increase of yield a higher N‐supply is not necessary with a minor plant density. 5. Essentially the yield level was only diminished with the lowest plant density (100‐140 plt./m 2 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction of soil N min content by plant N uptake slowed down at lower plant density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
reductione1
Direction
slowed downe1
Qualifier
in accordance with minor plant densitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reduction of the N min ‐content due to the N‐uptake by the plants slowed down in accordance with minor plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same soil N supply gave a higher N supply per individual winter wheat plant at decreasing plant density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
N‐supply per individual plante2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
in accordance with decreasing plant densitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“The same N‐supply in the soil produced a higher N‐supply per individual plant in accordance with decreasing plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–931 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower plant density led to a considerable increase of N-nutrition in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
N‐nutritione3
Direction
increasee3
Qualifier
considerablee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“lead to a considerable increase of N‐nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thin winter wheat crops showed higher tillering.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Thin cropse4
Outcome
tilleringe4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thin crops showed a higher tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1023 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in plant density between 150 and 550 plants per m2 diminished to about 90 ears per m2 at harvest.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
differences in plant densitye5
Direction
diminishede5
Value
about 90 ears/m 2e5
Qualifier
at harveste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“The differences in plant density between 150 and 550 plt./m 2 in spring diminished to about 90 ears/m 2 at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum winter wheat yield was obtained with about 120 kg/ha N supply in spring, independently of plant density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N min + N‐fertilizatione6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
maximume6
Value
120 kg/hae6
Qualifier
Independently of plant densitye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Independently of plant density the maximum yield was obtained by a N‐supply (N min + N‐fertilization) in spring of about 120 kg/ha N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield level of winter wheat was reduced only at the lowest plant density of 100-140 plants per m2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
lowest plant densitye1
Outcome
yield levele1
Direction
diminishede1
Value
100‐140 plt./m 2e1
Qualifier
onlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Essentially the yield level was only diminished with the lowest plant density (100‐140 plt./m 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1530 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A higher N supply is not necessary at a minor plant density of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
higher N‐supply is not necessarye7
Qualifier
with a minor plant densitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal N‐supply in spring for different plant densities of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–85 · show in text ↑
e7

“a higher N‐supply is not necessary with a minor plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1428 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.