Abstract
Abstract Pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.: syn. P. americanum (L.) Leeke] develops substantially lower predawn leaf water potentials than cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] under conditions of soil dehydration, but overall root length densities are greater in millet than in cowpea. The hypothesis was tested that, due to differences in root geometry and root length density, root systems of millet become less efficient in water uptake than those of cowpea as soil dries. Plants were grown in an artificial medium in pots or 1.15‐m tubes in a greenhouse and subjected to soil drying. Root geometries, root length densities, and water potentials of cowpea and millet were measured as the rooting medium dried. Distribution of roots was quantified by calculating a clumping ratio (total root length density divided by the root length density in the region surrounding individual root segment axes) at several depths within the profile. Overall root length densities were higher in millet than in cowpea, and root distributions differed. Millet roots were clumped locally along the root axis and globally within the profile, with the highest root length densities at the surface. Cowpea root lengths were one‐half as dense as millet along the root axis and distributed fairly uniformly throughout the profile. These data were used in two‐dimensional modeling of horizontal water transport from soil to branched segments of root axes of cowpea and millet to test the hypothesis. Simulations in which millet water potential became substantially lower than cowpea, and millet root length was twice as great as cowpea, predicted little difference in cumulative water flow to the roots of millet or cowpea during soil dehydration. This prediction is consistent with observations. Simulated water velocity vector fields indicated that millet's dense and clumped local root geometry became less efficient in water uptake under soil water deficits than cowpea's less dense and more evenly distributed root geometry because water uptake by millet was mainly at the root tips; in contrast, most of the root length of cowpea contributed to water uptake. Simulations conducted with millet root axes having different root length densities indicated that the low efficiency of millet in water uptake was due to the combined effects of local clumping and high root length density. When input parameters for roots and soil were varied, conclusions from the simulations remained the same.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet root length density exceeded cowpea root length density.
Verbatim
e0“Overall root length densities were higher in millet than in cowpea, and root distributions differed.”
Claim · model-written summary
Millet root distributions differed from cowpea root distributions.
Verbatim
e0“Overall root length densities were higher in millet than in cowpea, and root distributions differed.”
Claim · model-written summary
Millet roots were locally and globally clumped, with the highest density at the surface.
Verbatim
e0“Millet roots were clumped locally along the root axis and globally within the profile, with the highest root length densities at the surface.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea roots were half as dense as millet roots along the root axis.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Organ / stage
- root axise0
- Outcome
- root lengthse0
- Direction
- one‐half as densee0
- Value
- one‐halfe0
- Comparator
- millete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cowpea root lengths were one‐half as dense as millet along the root axis and distributed fairly uniformly throughout the profile.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea root lengths were fairly uniform through the profile.
- Taxon
- CowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Outcome
- root lengthse0
- Qualifier
- fairly uniformly throughout the profilee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cowpea root lengths were one‐half as dense as millet along the root axis and distributed fairly uniformly throughout the profile.”
Claim · model-written summary
The model predicted little difference in cumulative root water flow between millet and cowpea under dehydration.
Verbatim
e0“predicted little difference in cumulative water flow to the roots of millet or cowpea during soil dehydration.”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulated millet root geometry was less efficient in water uptake than cowpea under water deficits.
Verbatim
e0“millet's dense and clumped local root geometry became less efficient in water uptake under soil water deficits than cowpea's less dense and more evenly distributed root geometry”
Claim · model-written summary
In the simulation, millet water uptake occurred mainly at root tips.
Verbatim
e0“water uptake by millet was mainly at the root tips”
Claim · model-written summary
In the simulation, most cowpea root length contributed to water uptake.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Organ / stage
- root lengthe0
- Outcome
- root length of cowpea contributed to water uptakee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“most of the root length of cowpea contributed to water uptake.”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulations attributed low millet water uptake efficiency to combined local clumping and high root length density.
Verbatim
e0“the low efficiency of millet in water uptake was due to the combined effects of local clumping and high root length density.”
Claim · model-written summary
The simulation conclusions remained the same when root and soil inputs varied.
Verbatim
e0“When input parameters for roots and soil were varied, conclusions from the simulations remained the same.”