Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Effect of varying seeding rates on hybrid and conventional summer rape performance in Manitoba

A. E. Van Deynze; P. B. E. McVetty; R. Scarth; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To compare the effects of varying seeding rate on the agronomic performance, phenology and seed quality of hybrid and conventional summer rape cultivars, four hybrid and two conventional summer rape cultivars were seeded at 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0 and 9.0 kg ha −1 at two locations for 3 yr. The hybrid cultivars were, very importantly, 24% higher yielding and produced 50% more total dry matter than the conventional cultivars. The hybrid cultivars were, on average, 1.3% lower in seed oil content, 1.0% higher in seed protein content and equal in sum of oil and protein in the seed compared with the conventional cultivars. The hybrid cultivars were on average, 1.3 d later to 50% flowering and 1.1 d later to maturity than the average for the conventional cultivars, (i.e., equal or earlier to flowering and maturity than Regent). The hybrid cultivars were also 3.9% lower in harvest index and 1.3 ppm lower in chlorophyll content than the conventional cultivars. In spite of these differences, there were no significant cultivar-by-seeding-rate interactions, indicating that the hybrid and conventional cultivars responded similarly to varying seeding rate. Lodging, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, harvest index, survival, oil content and protein content displayed significant linear responses to varying seeding rate. Stand at maturity, seed yield and total dry matter production displayed significant linear and quadratic responses to varying seeding rate. Varying seeding rate had no effect on seed formation period, the sum of oil and protein content, or chlorophyll content. A seeding rate of 6 kg ha −1 maximized seed yield for both hybrid and conventional summer rape cultivars.Key words: Brassica napus, canola, seed quality, agronomy, phenology

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars yielded 24% more than conventional cultivars.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
highere0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were, very importantly, 24% higher yielding and produced 50% more total dry matter than the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars produced 50% more total dry matter.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
moree0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were, very importantly, 24% higher yielding and produced 50% more total dry matter than the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars had 1.3% lower seed oil content.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
seed oil contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.3%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were, on average, 1.3% lower in seed oil content, 1.0% higher in seed protein content and equal in sum of oil and protein in the seed compared with the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars had 1.0% higher seed protein content.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
seed protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.0%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were, on average, 1.3% lower in seed oil content, 1.0% higher in seed protein content and equal in sum of oil and protein in the seed compared with the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids and conventional cultivars had equal summed seed oil and protein.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
sum of oil and protein in the seede0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were, on average, 1.3% lower in seed oil content, 1.0% higher in seed protein content and equal in sum of oil and protein in the seed compared with the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars reached 50% flowering 1.3 days later.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
50% floweringe0
Direction
latere0
Value
1.3 de0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were on average, 1.3 d later to 50% flowering and 1.1 d later to maturity than the average for the conventional cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars matured 1.1 days later.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
latere0
Value
1.1 de0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were on average, 1.3 d later to 50% flowering and 1.1 d later to maturity than the average for the conventional cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars had 3.9% lower harvest index.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
3.9%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were also 3.9% lower in harvest index and 1.3 ppm lower in chlorophyll content than the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid cultivars had 1.3 ppm lower chlorophyll content.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Material
hybrid cultivarse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.3 ppme0
Comparator
conventional cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid cultivars were also 3.9% lower in harvest index and 1.3 ppm lower in chlorophyll content than the conventional cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant cultivar-by-seeding-rate interactions were detected.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
cultivar-by-seeding-rate interactionse0
Direction
no significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant cultivar-by-seeding-rate interactions, indicating that the hybrid and conventional cultivars responded similarly to varying seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodging, flowering, maturity, harvest index, survival, oil content, and protein content had significant linear responses to seeding rate.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
varying seeding ratee0
Outcome
Lodging, days to 50% flowering, days to maturitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lodging, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, harvest index, survival, oil content and protein content displayed significant linear responses to varying seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index, survival, oil content and protein content had significant linear responses to seeding rate.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
varying seeding ratee0
Outcome
harvest index, survival, oil content and protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lodging, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, harvest index, survival, oil content and protein content displayed significant linear responses to varying seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature stand, seed yield and dry matter had significant linear and quadratic responses to seeding rate.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
varying seeding ratee0
Outcome
Stand at maturity, seed yield and total dry matter productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stand at maturity, seed yield and total dry matter production displayed significant linear and quadratic responses to varying seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate did not affect seed formation period, summed oil and protein content, or chlorophyll content.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
Varying seeding ratee0
Outcome
seed formation period, the sum of oil and protein content, or chlorophyll contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varying seeding rate had no effect on seed formation period, the sum of oil and protein content, or chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seeding rate of 6 kg ha −1 maximized seed yield for both cultivar types.

Taxon
summer rapeBrassica napuse0
Material
hybrid and conventional summer rape cultivarse0
Treatment
6 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A seeding rate of 6 kg ha −1 maximized seed yield for both hybrid and conventional summer rape cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1694 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.