Paper · 2007 · Drying Technology

Drying of Garlic (Allium sativum) and Its Effect on Allicin Retention

C. Ratti; M. Araya-Farias; L. Mendez-Lagunas; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Convective hot air-drying and freeze-drying were investigated as potential processes to preserve and concentrate allicin in garlic. Both temperature and air velocity had an important effect on hot air-drying kinetics. Sample size and temperature significantly affected the duration of freeze-drying, and thus the remaining moisture content of the garlic samples. Allicin content decreased with an increase of drying temperature in both convective hot air-drying or freeze-drying. Moderate air temperatures (40 and 50°C) allowed a better allicin retention than higher temperatures (60°C). However, retention of allicin was more important in garlic samples freeze-dried at a temperature of 20°C. The drying method did not show a significant impact on glass transition temperature values, indicating that garlic composition is a more important factor than internal structure. The predictions of the Gordon and Taylor model are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and air velocity affected hot air drying kinetics.

Treatment
temperature and air velocitye0t0
Outcome
hot air-drying kineticse0t0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both temperature and air velocity had an important effect on hot air-drying kinetics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sample size and temperature significantly affected freeze drying duration and remaining moisture.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
Sample size and temperaturee0
Outcome
duration of freeze-drying, and thus the remaining moisture contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sample size and temperature significantly affected the duration of freeze-drying, and thus the remaining moisture content of the garlic samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher drying temperature decreased allicin content in both drying methods.

Treatment
increase of drying temperaturee0t0
Outcome
Allicin contente0t0
Direction
decreasede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Allicin content decreased with an increase of drying temperature in both convective hot air-drying or freeze-drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate air temperatures retained allicin better than 60°C.

Treatment
Moderate air temperatures (40 and 50°C)e0t0
Outcome
allicin retentione0t0
Direction
bettere0t0
Comparator
higher temperatures (60°C)e0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate air temperatures (40 and 50°C) allowed a better allicin retention than higher temperatures (60°C).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freeze drying at 20°C gave greater allicin retention.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
freeze-dried at a temperature of 20°Ce0
Outcome
retention of allicine0
Direction
more importante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“retention of allicin was more important in garlic samples freeze-dried at a temperature of 20°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying method had no significant impact on glass transition temperature.

Treatment
drying methode0t0
Outcome
glass transition temperature valuese0t0
Direction
did not show a significant impacte0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drying method did not show a significant impact on glass transition temperature values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Gordon and Taylor model predictions agreed with experimental data.

Outcome
predictions of the Gordon and Taylor modele0t0
Direction
good agreemente0t0
Comparator
experimental datae0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The predictions of the Gordon and Taylor model are in good agreement with the experimental data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–33 · show in text ↑

processing · soil: physics · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cold · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.