Paper · 2005 · Marine Ecology Progress Series

Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae)

EA Vasquez; EP Glenn; JJ Brown; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
181
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 298:1-8 (2005) - doi:10.3354/meps298001 Salt tolerance underlies the cryptic invasion of North American salt marshes by an introduced haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis (Poaceae) Edward A. Vasquez1, Edward P. Glenn1,*, J. Jed Brown2, Glenn R. Guntenspergen3, Stephen G. Nelson1 1Environmental Research Laboratory, 2601 East Airport Drive, Tucson, Arizona 85706, USA2Delaware River Fisheries Coordinator, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2610 Whitehall Neck Road, Smyrna, Delaware 19977, USA3US Geological Survey, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Suite 4039, Laurel, Maryland 20708-4039, USA *Corresponding author. Email: eglenn@ag.arizona.edu ABSTRACT: A distinct, non-native haplotype of the common reed Phragmites australis has become invasive in Atlantic coastal Spartina marshes. We compared the salt tolerance and other growth characteristics of the invasive M haplotype with 2 native haplotypes (F and AC) in greenhouse experiments. The M haplotype retained 50% of its growth potential up to 0.4 M NaCl, whereas the F and AC haplotypes did not grow above 0.1 M NaCl. The M haplotype produced more shoots per gram of rhizome tissue and had higher relative growth rates than the native haplotypes on both freshwater and saline water treatments. The M haplotype also differed from the native haplotypes in shoot water content and the biometrics of shoots and rhizomes. The results offer an explanation for how the M haplotype is able to spread in coastal salt marshes and support the conclusion of DNA analyses that the M haplotype is a distinct ecotype of P. australis. KEY WORDS: Salinity tolerance · Invasive species · Phragmites australis · Salt marshes Full text in pdf format NextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 298. Online publication date: August 15, 2005 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2005 Inter-Research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The invasive M reed haplotype retained half its growth potential up to 0.4 M NaCl.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australist0
Material
M haplotypee0
Treatment
0.4 M NaCle0
Outcome
growth potentiale0
Direction
retainede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
up toe0
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The M haplotype retained 50% of its growth potential up to 0.4 M NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“in greenhouse experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phragmites australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The native F reed haplotype did not grow above 0.1 M NaCl.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australist0
Material
Fe0
Treatment
0.1 M NaCle0
Outcome
did not growe0
Qualifier
abovee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas the F and AC haplotypes did not grow above 0.1 M NaCl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phragmites australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The native AC reed haplotype did not grow above 0.1 M NaCl.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australist0
Material
ACe0
Treatment
0.1 M NaCle0
Outcome
did not growe0
Qualifier
abovee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas the F and AC haplotypes did not grow above 0.1 M NaCl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phragmites australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M reed produced more shoots per gram of rhizome than native haplotypes under freshwater and saline treatments.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australist0
Material
M haplotypee0
Treatment
freshwater and saline water treatmentse0
Outcome
shoots per gram of rhizome tissuee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
native haplotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The M haplotype produced more shoots per gram of rhizome tissue and had higher relative growth rates than the native haplotypes on both freshwater and saline water treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phragmites australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M reed had higher relative growth rates than native haplotypes under freshwater and saline treatments.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australist0
Material
M haplotypee0
Treatment
freshwater and saline water treatmentse0
Outcome
relative growth ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
native haplotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The M haplotype produced more shoots per gram of rhizome tissue and had higher relative growth rates than the native haplotypes on both freshwater and saline water treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phragmites australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M reed differed from native haplotypes in shoot water content and shoot and rhizome biometrics.

Taxon
Phragmites australisPhragmites australist0
Material
M haplotypee0
Outcome
shoot water content and the biometrics of shoots and rhizomese0
Comparator
native haplotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The M haplotype also differed from the native haplotypes in shoot water content and the biometrics of shoots and rhizomes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phragmites australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The results explain M haplotype spread in coastal salt marshes and support its status as a distinct reed ecotype.

Taxon
P. australisPhragmites australise0
Material
M haplotypee0
Outcome
spread in coastal salt marshese0
Qualifier
a distinct ecotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phragmites australis
Phragmites australis · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results offer an explanation for how the M haplotype is able to spread in coastal salt marshes and support the conclusion of DNA analyses that the M haplotype is a distinct ecotype of P. australis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1812 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Phragmites australis (common reed)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.