Paper · 2006 · Journal of Environmental Sciences

Allelopathic effects of extracts from Solidago canadensis L. against seed germination and seedling growth of some plants.

Bing-yao Sun; Jian-zhong Tan; Wan Zhigang; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the potential role of allelopathy in plant interference and in the successful invasion of alien species Solidago canadensis, aqueous an d ethanolic extracts from rhizomes, stems and leaves of S. canadensis were prepa red and used as treatment solutions to assess their effects on seed germination and seedling growth in four target species, mulberry (Morus alba); morning glory (Pharbitis nil), wheat(Triticum aestivum) and rape(Brassica campestris). Reducti on and/or growth in germination and growth of the target plant species in the pr esence of both aqueous and ethanolic extracts at different concentrations indica ted that the responses were species-specific and concentration-dependent. Genera lly, ethanolic extracts(especially from leaves) imposed stronger effects on both seed germination and seedling growth. Extracts with lower concentration at 0.00 1 g/ml dw could stimulate the seedling growth of rape and morning glory, whereas extracts at any given concentrations have inhibitory effects on wheat and mulbe rry. It is suggested that the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of all the three pa rts of S. canadensis have significant allelopathic effects. Although both inhibi tion and stimulation occurred in the germination and growth of the target specie s, extracts with higher concentrations definitely inhibit seed germination and s eedling growth of all target plants. We suggest that allelopathy plays a more im portant role than other mechanisms do in the out-competition of S. canadensis ov er other plants, and make it invasive in new habitats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract responses varied by target species and concentration.

Taxon
some plantst0
Outcome
responsese0
Qualifier
species-specific and concentration-dependente0

Verbatim

e0

“the responses were species-specific and concentration-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“some plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanolic extracts, especially leaf extracts, had stronger effects on germination and seedling growth.

Taxon
some plantst0
Treatment
ethanolic extractse0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
strongere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ethanolic extracts(especially from leaves) imposed stronger effects on both seed germination and seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“some plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentration extracts stimulated rape seedling growth.

Treatment
Extracts with lower concentration at 0.00 1 g/ml dwe0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts with lower concentration at 0.00 1 g/ml dw could stimulate the seedling growth of rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentration extracts stimulated morning glory seedling growth.

Taxon
morning glorye0
Treatment
Extracts with lower concentration at 0.00 1 g/ml dwe0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts with lower concentration at 0.00 1 g/ml dw could stimulate the seedling growth of rape and morning glory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts inhibited wheat at all tested concentrations.

Treatment
extracts at any given concentrationse0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extracts at any given concentrations have inhibitory effects on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts inhibited mulberry at all tested concentrations.

Taxon
mulbe rrye0
Treatment
extracts at any given concentrationse0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“extracts at any given concentrations have inhibitory effects on wheat and mulbe rry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High concentration extracts inhibited target-plant seed germination and seedling growth.

Taxon
target plantse0
Treatment
extracts with higher concentrationse0
Outcome
seed germination and s eedling growthe0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“extracts with higher concentrations definitely inhibit seed germination and s eedling growth of all target plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1398 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer allelopathy is a major contributor to Solidago outcompetition and invasion.

Taxon
S. canadensisSolidago canadensise0
Outcome
out-competitione0
Qualifier
allelopathye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solidago canadensis
Solidago canadensis · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allelopathy plays a more im portant role than other mechanisms do in the out-competition of S. canadensis ov er other plants, and make it invasive in new habitats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1578 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 22 positive, 43 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.