Paper · 2009 · Crop Management

Is Deep Zone Tillage Agronomically Viable in Minnesota?

Jodi DeJong‐Hughes; Jane M. F. Johnson

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Deep zone tillage is a strategy used to alleviate compaction problems, including plow pans, and to improve internal drainage. Midwestern soils do not typically form a defined plow pan under normal production practices. Despite lack of scientific evidence for yield benefits associated with deep tillage, it is still used in Minnesota as a low cost alternative to tile drainage. To evaluate the soil and economic impact of deep zone tillage on crop yield when a restrictive layer is lacking, a 20‐acre field was deep zone tilled to a 20‐inch depth, every other 12 rows at 30‐inch spacing. After zone tilling, the entire field was ridge tilled. Ridge tillage confines wheel traffic to the same rows, reducing the percent of the field trafficked. All crop and soil measurements were collected in the depressional and upland areas of the field to distinguish if zone till is of benefit in different landscape areas. Crop yields were measured for two seasons following zone tilling a ridge‐tilled field. Zone till failed to increase corn and soybean yields. A restrictive layer was not observed in this field and as a result, potential economic losses occurred due to deep zone tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep zone tillage failed to increase corn yield.

Treatment
Zone tille0
Outcome
corne0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zone till failed to increase corn and soybean yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep zone tillage failed to increase soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Zone tille0
Outcome
soybean yieldse0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zone till failed to increase corn and soybean yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1052 · show in text ↑

tillage · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 27 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.