Paper · 2002 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

A rapid method to detect Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Cucujidae) larvae in stored grain

J. M. Minkevich; C. J. Demianyk; N. D. G. White; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Modifications of three detection methods, based on the heat-gradient principle employed by the Berlese funnel method were investigated to extract larvae of the rusty grain beetle, Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens), developing under the seed coats of infested kernels in grain samples. One-kilogram samples of wheat, barley and corn were artificially infested with rusty grain beetle eggs, resulting in survival rates (to larval stage) of 71.1 ± 14.4, 58.9 ± 14.3, and 24.7 ± 11.8%, respectively. Sets of 10 infested kernels containing different-aged larvae (10 individuals × 4 instars) were added to 1-kg samples of hydrated grain, then heated on screens beneath heat sources (lights) at several heights in three different containers (Berlese funnel, with a 7-cm-deep grain layer, or square and rectangular screened boxes with a grain layer several kernels deep). There were no significantly different extraction rates between the rectangular and square containers for all heating trials. A larval extraction rate of 31% was produced by 1-h trials with wheat (15% moisture content wet basis) 5.5 cm below the lamp bank with a thermostat set at 50°C. This matched the efficiency of the Berlese funnel method (36% extraction in 6 h), but in much less time. Similar results were found for barley, bu t for corn the square and rectangle gave significantly better extraction than the Berlese funnel, although extraction efficiency was half that of wheat and barley. Considerably lower extraction rates were obtained from trials that did not use a thermostat. The results from this experiment show that there is a potential alternative detection method with the thermostatically controlled heating of a thin layer of grain that should be faster than the conventional 6-h Berlese funnel method. Key words: Cryptolestes ferrugineus, grain, larval extraction, Berlese funnel, grain monolayer

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rusty grain beetle survival to larvae was 71.1 ± 14.4% in wheat.

Interactor
rusty grain beetlee0pest
Outcome
survival rates (to larval stage)e0
Value
71.1 ± 14.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, barley and corn were artificially infested with rusty grain beetle eggs, resulting in survival rates (to larval stage) of 71.1 ± 14.4, 58.9 ± 14.3, and 24.7 ± 11.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rusty grain beetle survival to larvae was 58.9 ± 14.3% in barley.

Interactor
rusty grain beetlee0pest
Outcome
survival rates (to larval stage)e0
Value
58.9 ± 14.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, barley and corn were artificially infested with rusty grain beetle eggs, resulting in survival rates (to larval stage) of 71.1 ± 14.4, 58.9 ± 14.3, and 24.7 ± 11.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rusty grain beetle survival to larvae was 24.7 ± 11.8% in corn.

Interactor
rusty grain beetlee0pest
Outcome
survival rates (to larval stage)e0
Value
24.7 ± 11.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, barley and corn were artificially infested with rusty grain beetle eggs, resulting in survival rates (to larval stage) of 71.1 ± 14.4, 58.9 ± 14.3, and 24.7 ± 11.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–496 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rectangular and square containers did not differ significantly in extraction rates.

Taxon
graint0
Interactor
Cryptolestes ferrugineusCryptolestes ferrugineuse1pest
Outcome
extraction ratese0
Direction
no significantly differente0
Comparator
square containerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryptolestes ferrugineus
Cryptolestes ferrugineus · InteractorPia Scanlon, DAFWA · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significantly different extraction rates between the rectangular and square containers for all heating trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–215 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A thermostatically heated wheat layer extracted 31% of larvae in one hour.

Treatment
thermostat set at 50°Ce0
Outcome
larval extraction ratee0
Value
31%e0
Qualifier
1-h trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A larval extraction rate of 31% was produced by 1-h trials with wheat (15% moisture content wet basis) 5.5 cm below the lamp bank with a thermostat set at 50°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1151 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat heating trial matched the Berlese funnel extraction efficiency in less time.

Outcome
efficiencye0
Direction
matchede0
Qualifier
36% extraction in 6 he0
Comparator
Berlese funnel methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This matched the efficiency of the Berlese funnel method (36% extraction in 6 h), but in much less time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“with wheat (15% moisture content wet basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1093 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yielded similar extraction results.

Outcome
Similar resultse0
Value
Similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were found for barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1294 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For corn, square and rectangular containers extracted larvae better than the Berlese funnel.

Outcome
extractione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Berlese funnele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for corn the square and rectangle gave significantly better extraction than the Berlese funnel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1395 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn extraction efficiency was half that of wheat and barley.

Outcome
extraction efficiencye0
Value
halfe0
Comparator
wheat and barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for corn the square and rectangle gave significantly better extraction than the Berlese funnel, although extraction efficiency was half that of wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1461 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trials without a thermostat had considerably lower extraction rates.

Taxon
graint0
Outcome
extraction ratese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
thermostate0

Verbatim

e0

“Considerably lower extraction rates were obtained from trials that did not use a thermostat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Thermostatically heating a thin grain layer could provide faster detection than the conventional six-hour funnel method.

Taxon
graint0
Treatment
thermostatically controlled heating of a thin layer of graine0
Outcome
potential alternative detection methode0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
conventional 6-h Berlese funnel methode0

Verbatim

e0

“there is a potential alternative detection method with the thermostatically controlled heating of a thin layer of grain that should be faster than the conventional 6-h Berlese funnel method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“stored grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–96 · show in text ↑