Paper · 1976 · Crop Science

Effects of Plant Density on the Quality of Cobs Used for Corn Cob Pipes1

P. J. Loesch; C. F. Stark; M. S. Zuber

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Special purpose corn ( Zea mays L.) cultivars and hybrids have been developed for manufacture of cob pipes. Little information is available concerning cultural practices most suited to the production of pipe corn. The objectives of the present investigation were to 1) determine whether plant density affects cob quality and 2) determine the simple correlations among cob quality traits. Tour corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids characterized by large cob size were evaluated at three densities at two locations in 2 years. Significant differences among hybrids were obtained for every trait studied and interactions among combinations of hybrids, years, locations, and plant spacing occurred frequently. Cob quality, as expressed by length, diameter, weight, and the length of cob exceeding a specified diameter, was improved significantly by reducing plant density. Similarly, crushing strength, weight, and density of 5.1‐cm cob sections increased significantly as plant density was reduced. Increased size, weight, density, and crushing strength would improve cob machinability and presumably increase the life expectancy of the pipes. We concluded that the pipe corn manufacturer would benefit appreciably by contracting pipe corn to be grown at relatively low plant densities to improve the quality and increase the frequency of acceptable cobs. Economic considerations will determine the appropriate plant density to achieve an acceptable balance between high quality cobs and grain yield per unit area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing plant density significantly improved cob quality of corn.

Treatment
reducing plant densitye1
Outcome
Cob qualitye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Cob Pipes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cob quality, as expressed by length, diameter, weight, and the length of cob exceeding a specified diameter, was improved significantly by reducing plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushing strength, weight and density of 5.1 cm cob sections increased significantly as plant density was reduced.

Treatment
plant density was reducede3
Outcome
crushing strengthe2
Direction
increased significantlye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Cob Pipes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“crushing strength, weight, and density of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–912 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased significantly as plant density was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–985 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant differences among corn hybrids were obtained for every trait studied.

Material
hybridse1
Outcome
every trait studiede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Cob Pipes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences among hybrids were obtained for every trait studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–591 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pipe corn manufacturers would benefit by contracting pipe corn grown at relatively low plant densities.

Taxon
pipe corne1
Outcome
contracting pipe corn to be grown at relatively low plant densitiese1

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Cob Pipes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“contracting pipe corn to be grown at relatively low plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1273 · show in text ↑

density · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.