Paper · 1976 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effects of daylength and day/night temperatures on growth and seed yield of cowpea cv. K 2809 grown in controlled environments

P. A. HUXLEY; R. J. SUMMERFIELD

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of climatic factors on the growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809) were investigated in controlled environment cabinets. Plants were grown to maturity in eight environments comprising all combinations of two day lengths (11 h 40 min and 13 h 20 min), two day (27 and 33 o C) and two night (19 and 24 o C) temperatures. The plants were nodulated ( Rhizobium strain CB 756) and received 197 ppm N throughout growth. Treatments changed the time to the appearance of first flowers by a maximum of 6 days but the later‐flowering plants more than doubled their dry weight during this period, so that effects on plant form and, ultimately, seed production were considerable. Warm nights (24 o C) not only hastened the onset of flowering but also enhanced dry matter production during the pre‐flowering period; they did not extend the total growing period. Warm days (33 o C) did not enhance dry matter production but shortened the duration of the growing period by an average of 21 days (20%). Variation in final seed yield was mainly due to differences in the number of pods borne on branches. Warm days markedly decreased the number of pods per plant (an overall average reduction of 49%) as did warm nights in conjunction with the long (13 h 20) daylength. The number of seeds per pod was effected only by daylength (8.3 and 7.6 seeds in the long and short daylengths, respectively). Mean seed weight was decreased by 19% in warm as compared to cool nights but was increased by 18% in warm as compared to cool days. These responses are compared with those obtained with soyabean cv. TK5 in a previous experiment and are shown, in general, to be similar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm nights (24 C) hastened the onset of flowering in cowpea.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
Warm nightse1
Outcome
onset of floweringe1
Direction
hastenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warm nights (24 o C) not only hastened the onset of flowering but also enhanced dry matter production during the pre‐flowering period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm nights enhanced dry matter production during the pre-flowering period.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Organ / stage
pre‐flowering periode1
Treatment
Warm nightse1
Outcome
dry matter productione1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warm nights (24 o C) not only hastened the onset of flowering but also enhanced dry matter production during the pre‐flowering period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm days (33 C) did not enhance dry matter production.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
Warm dayse1
Outcome
dry matter productione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warm days (33 o C) did not enhance dry matter production but shortened the duration of the growing period by an average of 21 days (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm days shortened the growing period by an average of 21 days (20%).

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
Warm dayse1
Outcome
duration of the growing periode1
Direction
shortenede1
Value
21 days (20%)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warm days (33 o C) did not enhance dry matter production but shortened the duration of the growing period by an average of 21 days (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm days markedly decreased the number of pods per plant, by 49% on average.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
Warm dayse1
Outcome
number of pods per plante1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
49%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warm days markedly decreased the number of pods per plant (an overall average reduction of 49%) as did warm nights in conjunction with the long (13 h 20) daylength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm nights in conjunction with the long daylength also decreased pods per plant.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
warm nights in conjunction with the long (13 h 20) daylengthe1
Outcome
number of pods per plante1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warm days markedly decreased the number of pods per plant (an overall average reduction of 49%) as did warm nights in conjunction with the long (13 h 20) daylength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of seeds per pod was affected only by daylength (8.3 long, 7.6 short).

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
daylengthe1
Outcome
number of seeds per pode1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
8.3 and 7.6 seedse1
Comparator
short daylengthse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of seeds per pod was effected only by daylength (8.3 and 7.6 seeds in the long and short daylengths, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed weight was 19% lower in warm than in cool nights.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
warm as compared to cool nightse1
Outcome
Mean seed weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
19%e1
Comparator
cool nightse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean seed weight was decreased by 19% in warm as compared to cool nights but was increased by 18% in warm as compared to cool days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed weight was 18% higher in warm than in cool days.

Material
cv. K 2809e0
Treatment
warm as compared to cool dayse1
Outcome
Mean seed weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18%e1
Comparator
cool dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, reproductive development and seed yield of cowpea (cv. K 2809)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean seed weight was decreased by 19% in warm as compared to cool nights but was increased by 18% in warm as compared to cool days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1561 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.